So I have slowly being making progress on a dependency manager for buildr and have put together a very simple implementation based on Bundler using Aether for the transitive resolution. I would love some feed back on what I have pieced together so far.

https://github.com/mguymon/lockjar

A Jarfile is used to specify the repos and dependencies, an example:

repository 'http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss'
jar "com.slackworks:model-citizen:0.1"
jar "org.apache.mina:mina-core:2.0.4" do exclude "com.package", "com.another.package:blah:7" end

Would produce a Jarfile.lock with absolute paths to the local jars, an example:

---

dependencies:
  com.slackworks:model-citizen:0.1: 
/home/zinger/devel/projects/swx/lockjar/tmp/test-repo/com/slackworks/model-citizen/0.1/model-citizen-0.1.jar
  org.apache.mina:mina-core:jar:2.0.4: 
/home/zinger/devel/projects/swx/lockjar/tmp/test-repo/org/apache/mina/mina-core/2.0.4/mina-core-2.0.4.jar
  org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.6.1: 
/home/zinger/devel/projects/swx/lockjar/tmp/test-repo/org/slf4j/slf4j-api/1.6.1/slf4j-api-1.6.1.jar

repositories:
  - http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss


The Jarfile.lock is standard yaml, not sure if a custom dsl is needed. Similar to bundler, the Jarfile.lock has to be generated before getting access to the dependencies. Once the Jarfile.lock is generated, Buildr can reuse it instead of checking for transitive dependencies every time.

Next step is moving the project towards something that integrates nicely with Buildr. Maybe allow the Jarfile to be defined directly in the buildfile?

thanks,
Michael

On 11/04/2011 06:13 AM, Peter Tillotson wrote:
This sounds pretty good - some thoughts inline below

Dependency Resolution

* Dependency resolution is optional
* Resolve Transitive Dependencies for an artifact(s)
* Create/Rebuild a dependency file
* Lock dependencies based on the dependency file

Transitive resolution should be capable of producing the same dependencies as 
maven ( possibly via an interface compatible plugin ) and support the full 
maven spec.

I'd add filtering and blacklist has been useful as well. I always have to package(:war).libs.reject! { |lib| lib.group == 'servlet-api' } this is a reasonable compile dependency that shouldn't get into runtime. If the dependencies file something like the following

runtime:
    - org.apache.cassandra:cassalndra-all:1.0.1
exclude:
    - *:servlet-api:*
    - *:junit:*

That would be pretty handy - I really like the idea of the dependency report 
effectively acting as the whitelist / blacklist so when the universe changes my 
build file doesn't necessarily have to :-)

Maven interop

* Generate a maven POM based on a Buildr project
* Create&  deploy maven friendly artifacts based on a Buildr project

Would there be any benefit for having Ivy interoperability as well?

p

________________________________
From: Michael Guymon<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011, 23:16
Subject: Re: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr


So based on the discussion, it sounds like the following solutions would work 
well:

Dependency Resolution

* Dependency resolution is optional
* Resolve Transitive Dependencies for an artifact(s)
* Create/Rebuild a dependency file
* Lock dependencies based on the dependency file

Maven interop

* Generate a maven POM based on a Buildr project
* Create&  deploy maven friendly artifacts based on a Buildr project

Would there be any benefit for having Ivy interoperability as well?

On 11/02/2011 09:59 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Chiaming Hsu<[email protected]>   wrote:
If this becomes part of the core of buildr as Peter suggested, would there be 
performance impact when not using transitive dependencies?
I would hope not.

I am not a huge fan of transitive closure across the builds when you
can't lock it down to a specific set (like Gemfile.lock or what Ivy4r
supports it seems). I don't object so much to the network chattiness
but due to the un-reproducible of builds.

Aether would mainly used as the API for interacting with Maven repos
and for implementing transitive dependencies of maven artifacts.



Reply via email to