Hi, as I was told that the 2.0 should be the first Apache release, will this then be the first Apache BuildStream release, or will this be one of the Non-Apache releases? I would assume, as you’re asking for votes, this is intended to be an Apache release, right?
Chris From: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan.vanber...@codethink.co.uk> Date: Wednesday, 26. October 2022 at 16:55 To: BuildStream <dev@buildstream.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Release buildstream / plugins 1.95.4 as 2.0 Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarballs and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildstream/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release these candidate tarballs BuildStream-1.95.4.dev0.tar.gz and buildstream-plugins-1.95.3.tar.gz as 2.0. [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarballs up for vote are: buildstream-plugins-1.95.3.tar.gz --------------------------------- sha256: 2d33ed4cba762ccc09bbea060e089db08da5ce6150f903a03928da004dcaa387 sha512: ee22235884e7dfa54f40bd2baa2df1c26284ce19b4393310cd54dbf60b9789dd075eadacb3189b2002b3254025ed02129fc2e451cadd48ce9ff4da4e8de8a92d BuildStream-1.95.4.dev0.tar.gz ------------------------------ sha256: 77f3aafa1268e4128108ac54fd6231cd5b548b0f2b00d84c9c83fc19f7095f60 sha512: 7cb335cc837cc70022ac398055e64c691863898daa2a9d0ae89270796b576e2ae692a2583c1a798cc34ba4769f73b92ff98ed26965f2ea2108df2c7ec490bc90 Cheers, -Tristan