Hi,

as I was told that the 2.0 should be the first Apache release, will this then 
be the first Apache BuildStream release, or will this be one of the Non-Apache 
releases? I would assume, as you’re asking for votes, this is intended to be an 
Apache release, right?

Chris


From: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan.vanber...@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Wednesday, 26. October 2022 at 16:55
To: BuildStream <dev@buildstream.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release buildstream / plugins 1.95.4 as 2.0
Hi all,

Please find below the proposed release tarballs and signatures:

  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildstream/

I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
these candidate tarballs BuildStream-1.95.4.dev0.tar.gz and
buildstream-plugins-1.95.3.tar.gz as 2.0.

[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.

The computed digests of the tarballs up for vote are:


buildstream-plugins-1.95.3.tar.gz
---------------------------------
sha256: 2d33ed4cba762ccc09bbea060e089db08da5ce6150f903a03928da004dcaa387
sha512: 
ee22235884e7dfa54f40bd2baa2df1c26284ce19b4393310cd54dbf60b9789dd075eadacb3189b2002b3254025ed02129fc2e451cadd48ce9ff4da4e8de8a92d


BuildStream-1.95.4.dev0.tar.gz
------------------------------
sha256: 77f3aafa1268e4128108ac54fd6231cd5b548b0f2b00d84c9c83fc19f7095f60
sha512: 
7cb335cc837cc70022ac398055e64c691863898daa2a9d0ae89270796b576e2ae692a2583c1a798cc34ba4769f73b92ff98ed26965f2ea2108df2c7ec490bc90


Cheers,
    -Tristan

Reply via email to