wooahhhh, today I did my first CMS edit. And not on some random page but on the foundation/how-it-works main page :D
Gav gave me the following tip. Just add the following bookmark the following in your browser: javascript:void(location.href='https://cms.apache.org/redirect?uri='+escape(location.href)) If you are on a page you like to edit, then just call click on your bookmark... LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Matt Benson <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 5:02 PM > Subject: Re: site for BVal? > > Hi guys, > What I was talking about on #asfinfra with Gavin was that we would > migrate the current content as static content in svnpubsub, then > decide what's next. It would seem that using the Apache CMS would be > more in line with the Confluence-exported site we have now, but it > would be wise to temper that observation with the fact our site has > fallen into a state of neglect over time. I personally don't know how > precisely how to generate the site from Confluence, so it would be my > guess that none of our active community members do. With infra having > mandated svnpubsub (technically for any new URL hostname, although > they would let us slide for the rest of 2012), the point is basically > moot and I personally think we should go ahead and decide what we want > to do in the future. Obviously Maven allows us to generate a lot of > content, particularly reports, and I am personally kind of fond of > using the shipped documentation locally rather than having to browse > online. Personally I am not hugely competent with Maven sites, > however, and less so with multimodule setups. I would hope that some > of the BVal folks who overlap with the Maven development team could > help us out as able. By the same token I am not very familiar with > the Apache CMS yet, but it's probably nearly as easy as Confluence, > it's at least somewhat documented, and it's supported. A third option > is that we could have a CMS-based site that incorporated the > Maven-generated site as a part of its content. > > I intend to proceed with migrating the current content as-is to > svnpubsub. As for the longer term, what do others think? > > Matt > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Simone Tripodi > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Gerhard, >> >> I know the svnpubsub requirement, experiencing it in the incubator, >> with mvn site is still possible to to deploy site on svn, that is a >> live example: <http://incubator.apache.org/any23/> >> >> best, >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Gerhard Petracek >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> hi simo, >>> >>> in general: >>> we have to use an approach which is compatible with svnsubpub or the > cms. >>> >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> 2012/2/18 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> which approach do we intend to follow, the mvn site one or the ASF > CMS? >>>> >>>> In the case we decide to proceed via mvn site, I'd suggest to > adopt >>>> the fluido-skin > <http://maven.apache.org/skins/maven-fluido-skin/> and >>>> can help on creating the site. >>>> >>>> All the best, have a nice weekend! >>>> -Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Mark Struberg > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Hi folks! >>>> > >>>> > Who is volunteering for creating the site for bval? :D >>>> > >>>> > LieGrue, >>>> > strub >>>> > >>>> >
