[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13240004#comment-13240004
]
Lars Francke commented on BVAL-103:
-----------------------------------
Hi,
sorry to jump into this without having participated in any of the previous
discussions. I personally have no problem with a dependency on SLF4J but I
understand the reasoning behind the switch to JUL. A dependency on SLF4J has
the advantage of clearly documenting the logging that a library uses.
That said it'd be very nice to have it documented somewhere that BVal can log
using JUL. There are some libraries where I only found out after quite some
time that they log at all.
> switch BVal from slf4j to java.util.logging
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BVAL-103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-103
> Project: BVal
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.3-incubating
> Reporter: Matt Benson
> Assignee: Mohammad Nour
>
> Team consensus seems to go that the convenience of slf4j for the bval team
> doesn't justify the potential inconvenience for users, given the slight
> amount of logging we do.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
