No plan per se; someone should pop the features into JIRA and we can go from there. Off the top of my head the big items are method validation and CDI. Hopefully it won't be a huge leap to bridge our existing method validation to the spec, backward-compatibly if possible.
I've been unwilling to do any more big refactorings in the codebase until we sort out the privileged stuff; Mark and I have been working on the privilizer component of/and Commons [weaver] and what's in trunk works more or less but I'm not satisfied with the existing Javassist implementation because it refuses to create working bytecode for valid code and I can't get any support, so I've been rewriting to use ASM as time permits (it hasn't permitted much). :| Thanks for jumping in, Romain! Matt On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Albert Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. > > Do we have any plan implementing 1.1 spec? > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > would be great to start working on bval 1.1 but we need to correctly > handle > > bval 1.0. > > > > ATM the last release is 0.5 and the trunk is 0.6-SNAPSHOT. Discussing > about > > it with Mark we thought it would be great to get a bval-1.0 maybe then > > update trunk to work on 1.1. > > > > wdyt? > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > -- > Albert Lee. >
