On Sep 17, 2013 12:30 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well for *spec* users it is not important Matt. > You are correct, but I still say (and I'm not the first) that we need to provide a stable API for those users who need to create custom extensions to BVal that require deeper integration than the specification can provide.
Matt > Le 17 sept. 2013 19:27, "Matt Benson" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Albert Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Would it be feasible to release the current trunk content as bval-1.0 and >> > create a branch as 1.0.x for anyone who has a need to continue with this >> > code base, then replace trunk with bval-1.1 content, which will become the >> > on-going development code base. >> > >> > >> The problem with this approach as I see it is that we never thoroughly >> ironed out the APIs in trunk. Once we call it 1.0 we are fairly well >> committed to the Apache BVal APIs we have exposed, so it's important to >> make those something we are all happy with. In any case I anticipate we >> would have a 1.0.x branch, but for everything 1.x the APIs should be >> compatible IMO. >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> > BTW, is the bval-11 branch implementation completed and close to TCK >> > compliant. If not, what else are still missing? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Albert >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi all, >> > > Romain has finished implementing Bean Validation 1.1 in his branch [1]. >> > > Meanwhile we've still never reached 1.0 with our BV 1.0 implementation. >> > > There are a number of changes on the 1.1 branch that are broadly >> > > applicable and should probably be included in 1.0, but I am honestly not >> > > confident that the broadly applicable changes can be conveniently sorted >> > > from the 1.1-specific changes. I therefore propose that we allow 1.1 to >> > > become the new trunk and devise some strategy for the exclusion of 1.1 >> > > features to create our 1.0 release (AIUI OWB does something similar for >> > CDI >> > > specification versions so maybe Mark and Romain can help in that regard). >> > > >> > > Matt >> > > >> > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/branches/bval-11/ >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Albert Lee. >> >
