How about switching bv2 to master and master to bval-1.1.x ?

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 01.05.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> 
> Sounds good
> 
> Maybe just bval-impl then.
> 
> Le 1 mai 2018 19:51, "Matt Benson" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
>> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
>>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Le 1 mai 2018 18:53, "Matt Benson" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>>  I have upgraded commons-weaver to be compatible with Java 8 and
>> enhanced
>>> the privilizer module to handle method references. Our bv2 branch can now
>>> successfully run its "sec" profile on Linux. Since it works there but no
>>> longer works on Windows, I expect the reason is policy file platform
>>> weirdness. Anybody who wants to work on that is welcome but I'm not
>>> considering it to be a blocker.
>>> 
>>>  The Hibernate guys have released the 2.0.3.Final version of the TCK
>> which
>>> included several fixes and our branch passes this version of the TCK.
>>> 
>>>  As I see it our remaining tasks are:
>>> * rename and repackage the bval-jsr module
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To? I renamed to jsr for bval 1.1 to avoid future renaming so hope to
>> stay
>>> stable here
>>> 
>> 
>> Remember that I merged the remaining needed code from bval-core into
>> bval-jsr as part of the decision to drop the legacy support. Apache BVal is
>> now focused on Bean Validation in deed as in word. I considered renaming
>> the module back to bval-core, but I think it's more appropriate to simply
>> name it "bval".
>> 
>> 
>>> * add OSGI manifest info to that module and remove the bundle module
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bundle was more a shade, we can have both pby
>>> 
>> 
>> With the removal of the erstwhile bval-core, a bundle shading in bval-jsr
>> should be equivalent to bval-jsr + osgi.
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> 
>>> * see that commons-weaver 1.4 is released in the Commons community
>>> 
>>> We can discuss these in more detail in separate threads, but does anyone
>>> else know of some other critical task we should be considering?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nthg, just let it go out and congrats for your work!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to