Hey Thomas and all,

Did you get a chance to work on the migration?
I've got a few hours I could dedicate to do the bulk migration and upgrade
the APIs + TCKs (after creating the maintenance branch of course).
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:09 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> @Francesco, bval has a jakarta version in 2.0.6 (same as openjpa) - if it
> helps.
> @Thomas: never saw it used nor any user feedback on the list so assuming
> they are not used at all.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le jeu. 12 janv. 2023 à 09:06, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > what about the extras, romain? are they unused?
> >
> > Am Do., 12. Jan. 2023 um 08:57 Uhr schrieb Francesco Chicchiriccò <
> > ilgro...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > not a dev here, just chiming in because we're moving Syncope to Spring
> > > Boot 3 / Jakarta and had to replace our BVal dependencies with
> Hibernate
> > > Validator's just because of namespace issues.
> > >
> > > Just my 2c: speaking from experience with OpenJPA, shading works but a
> > > clean new version would help with usability.
> > > Either way, making BVal compatible with Jakarta is something that would
> > > definitely help users stick with it and not to be forced to change.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your work with BVal, everyone.
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > > On 2023/01/10 12:46:49 Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > i would like to finally migrate BVal to the jakarta namespace.
> > > > WDYT?
> > > > I would create a 2.0.x branch and set master to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > > >
> > > > I know that shading has benefits but as we dont have that many
> releases
> > > > each year, i dont think its a big problem for us to handle master
> and a
> > > > second branch if we really need a release.
> > > > Also check our JIRA - we dont have any recent bug reports.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to