If we pass the TCK I'm fine doing a final. If there are bugs we can fix them in 3.0.x or have new features in 3.1.x
Le ven. 21 avr. 2023, 09:20, Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > IMO we can just release 3.0.0; we pass the TCK, so it should be stable. > > > Am Fr., 21. Apr. 2023 um 08:40 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi, > > > > What the plan to be final? Idea would be that if alpha is not justified > by > > coming work let's do a final. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 21 avr. 2023 à 08:29, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > a > > écrit : > > > > > hi folks! > > > > > > BVAL-3.0 looks already really decent - thanks for all that hard work! > > > What do you think about an alpha-1 release? > > > > > > I've yesterday published a snapshot to our official ASF snapshots repo > to > > > be able to work on OpenJPA-4.0. > > > But before we do any release of a EE9/10 project we'd need some other > > > stable releases first. BVAL is rather low in the dependency graph, so > I'd > > > go for it soonish. > > > > > > wdyt? > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > >
