I think someone should log a new JIRA case, since these issues are not directly 
related to Cassandra.

Julian

> On Mar 6, 2016, at 10:34 PM, Rajat Venkatesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Couple of other instances are reported here:
> https://github.com/qubole/quark/issues/27
> 
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:01 AM Michael Mior (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>    [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182600#comment-15182600
>> ]
>> 
>> Michael Mior commented on CALCITE-1104:
>> ---------------------------------------
>> 
>> Awesome, thanks! Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. This
>> happens to be particularly relevant here because Cassandra requires that
>> materialized views be defined by a query which cannot produce NULL values
>> for the primary keys.
>> 
>>> Materialized view support for Cassandra adapter
>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>>                Key: CALCITE-1104
>>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1104
>>>            Project: Calcite
>>>         Issue Type: Improvement
>>>           Reporter: Michael Mior
>>>           Assignee: Julian Hyde
>>>           Priority: Minor
>>> 
>>> I managed to get support for a subset of Cassandra [materialized views|
>> https://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/new-in-cassandra-3-0-materialized-views].
>> ( Thanks owed to some hints from [~maryannxue]!)
>>> The one thing I noticed so far which is not supported is UUID literals
>> in the WHERE clauses in the Cassandra view definition. However, I don't
>> think that's a common use case. The adapter will log a warning if it
>> encounters a view that can't be processed. At the very least, the view will
>> be exposed as a table to Calcite (it wasn't in the previous version of the
>> adapter).
>>> As per [CALCITE-1101|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1101],
>> there is probably a better way to hook in and add these views. I thought I
>> would still put this up for now. I'd still like to add some tests before
>> considering this viable.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> (v6.3.4#6332)
>> 

Reply via email to