CALCITE-1158 could go in too: it is simple change to make AggregateRemoveRule 
extensible, it should not destabilize the release.

Thanks,
Jesús






On 3/16/16, 11:09 PM, "Jacques Nadeau" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I'm working on a string commits with the Drill dev team on this branch:
>
>https://github.com/jacques-n/incubator-calcite/tree/calcite-drill-2
>
>This includes the remaining patches we need to upstream from Drill
>including: CALCITE-528, 1150, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1151, 1149, 991 and
>1148.
>
>Once we get good test coverage  and feedback incorporated, we'll get those
>merged.
>
>That being said, I think we should target 1.8 for all of these. From that
>perspective, I don't we need to hold up the release for any of the items I
>listed (1148 was the only one on your list).
>
>For 1148, we're still seeing a few issues that I think need to be resolved
>before it is ready to merge.
>
>I'd like to suggest running a 1.9 (or 1.8.x?) once we get these merged so
>we can move Drill to a released version of Calcite as soon as possible (and
>then stay there).
>
>thanks,
>Jacques
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> An update on the release. We’ve slipped a day or two, because we need to
>> wait for Avatica 1.7.1. But the remaining issues are making good progress.
>>
>> * 1116, 1114, 1147, 1153, 1146 are approved and ready to commit as soon as
>> the Avatica vote passes.
>> * 1054 isn’t going to make it into 1.7.
>> * That leaves 1148. I’ll review it.
>>
>> Committers, please don’t commit to master without discussing here first.
>> We need the main line to be stable.
>>
>> Draft release notes:
>> https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/master/site/_docs/history.md
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 14, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Now Avatica 1.7.0 is done, let’s get cracking on Calcite 1.7.0. I
>> volunteer to be release manager. I’d like to finish a few issues that have
>> patches available and make the first RC on Wednesday.
>> >
>> > Issues:
>> >
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1054 Null handling
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1116 Simplify
>> expressions
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1114 Stream TCK
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1147 NPE in metadata
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1153 Oracle CAST
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1146 CSV example
>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1148 RelTrait
>> >
>> > And I’d love it if Julien le Dem and Tom Barber could finish their
>> long-standing PRs:
>> >
>> > * https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/162
>> > * https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/168
>> >
>> > Julian
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Mar 3, 2016, at 10:14 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> (Left a note on CALCITE-1077 to this effect already, copying here for
>> visibility)
>> >>
>> >> I've started some work on spinning out Avatica. As a first-pass, it's
>> not too bad. I do need to circle around again, cross some t's, dot some
>> i's. The branch is up [1]. I'll send out another not when I think it's
>> closer/ready.
>> >>
>> >> - Josh
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://github.com/joshelser/calcite/tree/1077-avatica-detach
>> >>
>> >> Josh Elser wrote:
>> >>> Let me try to spin Avatica out this week. I don't think it should be
>> too
>> >>> much pain up front (famous last words). If I don't get to it, it's not
>> >>> the end of the world.
>> >>>
>> >>> Julian Hyde wrote:
>> >>>> When would be a good time for release 1.7?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Josh, I know you’d like to split out Avatica. When do you expect to do
>> >>>> that work? When do you think it might be finished?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dependent projects, Do you have releases scheduled that would make you
>> >>>> want a release at a particular time?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I’m always inclined to release early and often, so I’d like to start
>> >>>> on a release in the next week.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Would anyone like to be release manager?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Julian
>> >>>>
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to