Would it be useful if I push a snapshot of Calcite’s master branch, so that 
downstream projects (e.g. Solr, Storm, Hive) can make sure that it doesn’t 
break anything? I’d do it a few days before the first RC, to give you time to 
run your test suites against it.

Julian


> On Dec 20, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Great, thanks Jesus.
> 
> I’ve logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1547 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1547> to track the release.
> 
> Julian
> 
>> On Dec 20, 2016, at 5:13 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Julian,
>> 
>> I will try to push 1456 and 1413 before Wed 28th (1421 is just site 
>> documentation update), please do not defer them to next release yet. 
>> However, if they are not pushed on time, feel free to do so.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jesús
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/19/16, 8:13 PM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>> So, I’m hearing that we should make a release soonish. I propose code 
>>> freeze by Wed 28th (9 days from now), hopefully release in 1st or 2nd week 
>>> of January. Does that sound reasonable?
>>> 
>>> Does anyone volunteer to be a release manager? I’d rather not be release 
>>> manager again, but I’ll do it if no one else wants to.
>>> 
>>> What issues remain?
>>> * I am working on a few sub-query issues (1511, 1537, 1494).
>>> * Jesus: You have 1456, 1421, 1413 assigned to you and marked fixVersion = 
>>> 1.11.0. Do you intend to fix these?
>>> * Is anyone working on cases that must be in 1.11? If so, speak up now. We 
>>> can hold the release if you need more time, but only for a short time.
>>> * (If you would like an issue fixed for 1.11 but are not prepared to work 
>>> on it I’m not very interested in hearing about it. Sorry.)
>>> 
>>> What issues are ready to review?
>>> * There are pull requests for 1540, 1414.
>>> * Maryann: There are several pull requests from you that I think you have 
>>> committed already[1]. Can you close those PRs? (If a committer commits a 
>>> non-committer’s pull request, they add “Close apache/calcite#NNN” to the 
>>> commit comments, so that the PR gets closed, but this didn’t happen because 
>>> you committed directly.) 
>>> 
>>> Is there any work for 1.11 that is not yet captured by a JIRA case?
>>> 
>>> Julian
>>> 
>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls 
>>> <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls><https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>>>  <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls>>
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 19, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Kevin Risden <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Solr (SOLR-8593) is waiting on 1.11 as well.
>>>> 
>>>> Kevin Risden
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Arun Mahadevan <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> +1 for releasing 1.11 ASAP. It has some fixes that Apache Storm
>>>>> (storm-sql) is waiting on.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Arun
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/15/16, 3:21 AM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> When should we be targeting to release Calcite version 1.11?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Last release (1.10) was 12th October. Usually we release every 2 months,
>>>>> so we’re already overdue. Since 1.10 we’ve had 76 commits, and about 60 
>>>>> bug
>>>>> fixes (not counting Avatica work).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What bug fixes/features would people like to contribute to the release?
>>>>> What are your time constraints?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Julian
> 

Reply via email to