if it is not SQL standard, it's just a matter of categorizing it to some
dialect ?

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Michael Mior <mm...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> Apologies for my silence. I don't really have thoughts on the matter at
> this point. It might be helpful if you can give an example of what you're
> proposing. Unless I'm missing something (very possible), it's not part of
> the SQL standard.
>
> --
> Michael Mior
> mm...@apache.org
>
> 2018-04-03 18:48 GMT-04:00 Shuyi Chen <suez1...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Friendly ping, any thoughts? Much appreciated.
> >
> > Shuyi
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:59 PM, Shuyi Chen <suez1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi community,
> > >
> > > I am thinking of adding the following support in Calcite to support
> named
> > > row construction, e.g.
> > >
> > > SELECT (a as first_name, b as last_name, (c as zip code, d as street, e
> > as
> > > state) as address) as record FROM example_table
> > >
> > > The output will be struct with field names specified in the SQL. The
> > usage
> > > scenario is that say, in streaming SQL, the downstream sink's schema
> can
> > > not be changed, so we will need to use SQL to construct a struct with
> the
> > > proper naming according to the schema in order to write to the
> downstream
> > > sinks. Thanks a lot.
> > >
> > > Shuyi
> > >
> > > --
> > > "So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your
> future."
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future."
> >
>



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
no mistakes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to