I pushed to the julianhyde/coverity_scan branch but I have not
received any results back. Frankly I can't remember what's supposed to
happen. It's been a while.

We should drop the coverity requirement for this release. If someone
would like to try to get it working again, that would be great.

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:20 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for merging the PR and for clarifying.
>
> I agree that it is useful to forward this question to dev list to avoid
> similar questions in future.
>
> Kind regards,
> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>
>
> нд, 15 лип. 2018 о 00:28 Julian Hyde <[email protected]> пише:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hello Julian,
>> >
>> > Sorry for bothering in non-working hours.
>>
>> No worries! Work never stops. Thanks for working during your weekend, also.
>>
>> I replied to the dev list, since this concerns the release and
>> development. (Usually I don't reply to personal emails on a public
>> list, but I took the liberty this time, since there didn't seem to be
>> anything sensitive/personal in your message. Hope that's OK.)
>>
>> > One of the steps in the instruction for preparing the release is
>> triggering
>> > a Coverity scan by merging the latest code into the
>> julianhyde/coverity_scan
>> > branch.
>> >
>> > I have created PR with the latest changes from the master: PR-13.
>> >
>> > Could you please merge this PR to trigger a Coverity scan or please let
>> me
>> > know if this step is optional and may be omitted.
>>
>> I have merged to julianhyde/coverity_scan. I'll forward the coverity
>> results to you (and the dev list) when I get them.
>>
>> The coverity scan has become optional - we have skipped it for the
>> last few releases. I expect the scan will turn up some interesting
>> warnings, but it will be difficult to tell whether any are
>> show-stoppers without significant time and effort. Therefore I
>> recommend that we don't let the coverity results hold back the
>> release. We can analyze them in the background, and fix any issues we
>> find with appropriate urgency.
>>
>> Julian
>>

Reply via email to