Thanks for logging a case. It’s not high on my priorities to fix this (or 
anyone else’s AFAIK) so contributions are welcome.

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 3:37 AM, Krishnakant Agrawal <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Julian,
> 
> Sorry for the late Reply.
> 
> I have created the JIRA
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2552> for
> this issue.
> 
> I think Order by Ordinal if decided as the default behavior for this
> resolution should also ask the Dialect before taking decisions.
> 
> Hive 1.2 shows following message for query:-
> 
> *hive> select id from s.emp order by 1;*
> *Warning: Using constant number 1 in order by. If you try to use position
> alias when hive.groupby.orderby.position.alias is false, the position alias
> will be ignored.*
> 
> Regards,
> Krishnakant
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:48 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> It sounds like a bug. Can you please log a JIRA case.
>> 
>> We should consult the target dialect and generate sql according to the
>> rules for what is allowed in ORDER BY.
>> 
>> In calcite, and probably also in hive, “ORDER BY emp.first_name” would be
>> valid. But probably “ORDER BY <ordinal>” is the best solution on dialects
>> that support it (and most do).
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 09:41, Krishnakant Agrawal <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> I am trying to convert a Simple RelNode to SQL Text with Hive as Dialect
>>> using RelToSqlConverter.
>>> 
>>> Problem is if the Order By Key is a Projection which was Aliased, the
>>> Output query contains the original column name instead of the Alias,
>> which
>>> is not allowed in Hive as valid Order By keys are projections only.
>>> 
>>> For Instance,
>>> Select first_name as n1 from emp order by first_name; (Failing in hive!)
>>> 
>>> Expected SQL,
>>> Select first_name as n1 from emp order by n1;
>>> 
>>> I create the TableScan, Projection(with the alias) & Sort in the
>> mentioned
>>> order.
>>> 
>>> Any leads would be greatly appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> Krishnakant
>> 

Reply via email to