+1 Definitely continue to ignore warnings about missing @param and @return. I don’t want to encourage people to write information-free javadoc comments. A good one-line description is much better than 10 lines of garbage.
> On Sep 19, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to fail the build on Javadoc warnings (e.g. broken link, > invalid html tag, etc). > Current code has lots of warnings on missing @param and @return, and it > would take a while to invent meaningful comments there, so I assume we > would like to ignore missing-* warnings. > > Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2518 > PR: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/843 > > if no-one objects within three days, I'll assume lazy consensus and commit > it. > > Vladimir
