Thanks Francis!

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org


Le dim. 2 déc. 2018 à 21:13, Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> a
écrit :

> Avatica 1.13.0 has been tagged and released. I am holding off the formal
> announcement until the release artifacts propagate across all mirrors.
>
> The Hypersql docker image was also published successfully using docker
> hub hooks:
> - https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/calcite-avatica/
> - https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/calcite-avatica-hypersql/
>
> On 29/11/2018 8:21 am, Francis Chuang wrote:
> > Good catch, Julian! I've updated the commit to remove the comment.
> >
> > On 29/11/2018 4:41 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
> >> In docker/src/main/dockerhub/Dockerfile, is the comment line
> >>
> >>    # This line must be preserved. The Maven build will verify this
> >> version matches its version
> >>
> >> still accurate?
> >>
> >>> On Nov 28, 2018, at 2:12 AM, Francis Chuang
> >>> <francischu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> If there are no objections, I plan to merge my PR for CALCITE-2698
> >>> [1] in around 12 hours time and make rc0 available for voting.
> >>>
> >>> Francis
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/79
> >>>
> >>> On 24/11/2018 1:03 pm, Julian Hyde wrote:
> >>>> Great, thanks. Just wanted to make sure I wasn’t they only one
> >>>> seeing this.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Nov 23, 2018, at 6:00 PM, Francis Chuang
> >>>>> <francischu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> `mvn site` should work correctly once my PR for CALCITE-2698 is
> >>>>> merged.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> `mvn site` broke because my fix for CALCITE-2385 required
> >>>>> -DskipDockerCheck to be appended to all invocations of `mvn`. The
> >>>>> fix for CALCITE-2698 removes this check and allows docker hub to
> >>>>> pass the avatica version to be used to the dockerfile directly
> >>>>> during a build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 24/11/2018 5:41 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
> >>>>>> Are you aware that  “mvn site” has been broken for several days?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.7.1:site
> >>>>>> (default-site) on project avatica-parent: failed to get report
> >>>>>> for org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin: Failed to
> >>>>>> execute goal org.codehaus.gmaven:groovy-maven-plugin:2.1:execute
> >>>>>> (check-dockerhub-dockerfile-version) on project avatica-docker:
> >>>>>> Execution check-dockerhub-dockerfile-version of goal
> >>>>>> org.codehaus.gmaven:groovy-maven-plugin:2.1:execute failed:
> >>>>>> Expected Avatica version of 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT but got 1.12.0 ->
> >>>>>> [Help 1]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Nov 22, 2018, at 2:50 PM, Francis Chuang
> >>>>>>> <francischu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will be delaying the vote for rc0 for a few days as I would
> >>>>>>> like to get CALCITE-2698 [1] into this release. This change will
> >>>>>>> publish the avatica-hsqldb image to docker hub and allow the
> >>>>>>> avatica-go integration tests to switch from my unofficial
> >>>>>>> avatica-hsqldb image to the official image from Calcite.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2698
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 19/11/2018 8:39 am, Francis Chuang wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Quick update for the release of Avatica 1.13.0.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I was able to get releases and tests to build correctly in a
> >>>>>>>> docker container. This is now committed to the repository as
> >>>>>>>> docker-compose.yaml and docker.sh. The setup allows a committer
> >>>>>>>> to start the release by running `docker-compose run -v
> >>>>>>>> /c/Users/username/AppData/Roaming/gnupg:/.gnupg release`. The
> >>>>>>>> script prompts the user for things like the release version and
> >>>>>>>> so on and automatically sets up the environment in the
> >>>>>>>> container. I feel that this drastically flattens the learning
> >>>>>>>> curve for making an Avatica release and will be using it for
> >>>>>>>> 1.13.0. I think it might also be useful for Calcite.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In terms of the PRs on Github:
> >>>>>>>> - INFRA just enabled Appveyor for the repository, so
> >>>>>>>> CALCITE-2412 will be resolved and merged for this release soon.
> >>>>>>>> - I wasn't able to reach Kevin Minder for CALCITE-2322[1]. It
> >>>>>>>> does look like it is very close to being able to be merged.
> >>>>>>>> Would anyone be interested in picking this up? We would still
> >>>>>>>> keep Kevin's original commit, so that he gets credit for the
> >>>>>>>> initial implementation.
> >>>>>>>> - Michael and I tried to get in touch with the author of
> >>>>>>>> PR#76[2], but we didn't hear back, so I don't think this will
> >>>>>>>> make it into the release.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There are also test failures on Travis and Jenkins, so I plan
> >>>>>>>> to send another email to the list to start a discussion.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If there are no objections, I plan to make rc0 available for
> >>>>>>>> voting this Friday (23/11/2018) Australian Eastern Standard Time.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/49
> >>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/76
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 14/11/2018 6:56 am, Francis Chuang wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for taking a look, Kevin!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'll try and see if I can get in touch with the Sergey and
> >>>>>>>>> Kevin Minder to see if those PRs can make it into this release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 14/11/2018 2:15 am, Kevin Risden wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> I checked my PRs and they can't be merged yet for various
> >>>>>>>>>> reasons.
> >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2322 would be good to get in. CALCITE-2412 I think is
> >>>>>>>>>> pretty close
> >>>>>>>>>> just needs to be updated to current master. I checked on
> >>>>>>>>>> Travis CI a few
> >>>>>>>>>> weeks ago for Windows support and it didn't look like it had
> >>>>>>>>>> everything
> >>>>>>>>>> yet. I wouldn't move to it before this release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Kevin Risden
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:40 PM Julian Hyde
> >>>>>>>>>> <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I don’t personally have an issue voting during thanksgiving
> >>>>>>>>>>> week; after
> >>>>>>>>>>> all, it’s just U.S, and it’s just 2 days. I don’t think you
> >>>>>>>>>>> should back the
> >>>>>>>>>>> release. If you can’t get enough votes, extend the voting
> >>>>>>>>>>> period.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 12, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Francis Chuang
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <francischu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have assigned my self to CALCITE-2576 (Release Avatica
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13) and will
> >>>>>>>>>>> be release manager for this release, if there are no
> >>>>>>>>>>> objections.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If possible, I'd like to have a release for voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>> available by the end
> >>>>>>>>>>> of next week (23/11/2018). Unfortunately, this is during
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanksgiving, but
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am hoping that everyone will have the opportunity to test
> >>>>>>>>>>> the release and
> >>>>>>>>>>> cast a vote by the following week. Assuming rc0 passes, we
> >>>>>>>>>>> can then make
> >>>>>>>>>>> the release official by the end of that week (1/12/2018).
> >>>>>>>>>>> This will then
> >>>>>>>>>>> allow us to release Calcite 1.18 sometime in December,
> >>>>>>>>>>> before Christmas.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any issues/features you guys would like to see in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this release
> >>>>>>>>>>> of Avatica? This is now the chance to get them into 1.13.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/2018 11:17 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A new release of Avatica would be great. And we would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> able to use it
> >>>>>>>>>>> in the upcoming Calcite, and upgrade Calcite’s version of
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jetty.  (See
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467.)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 11, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Francis Chuang
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <francischu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to start up some discussion to release Avatica
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13.0. It's
> >>>>>>>>>>> been roughly 5 months since the last Avatica release and
> >>>>>>>>>>> Kevin has made
> >>>>>>>>>>> quite a few improvements to the code base. There are
> >>>>>>>>>>> currently around 24
> >>>>>>>>>>> new commits since the last release. In addition, Jetty has
> >>>>>>>>>>> also been
> >>>>>>>>>>> upgraded, which I believe would be beneficial for Calcite.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a script to build Avatica releases using docker in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a branch and
> >>>>>>>>>>> plan to merge it in for this release. I also want to fix
> >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2385
> >>>>>>>>>>> (Cannot build if we update the AVATICA_VERSION in the
> >>>>>>>>>>> dockerfile during a
> >>>>>>>>>>> dry-run release).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In terms of open PRs on Github:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Kevin, can you see if your open PRs can make it into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this release?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - CALCITE-2412 to add appveyor for testing on Windows (
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/65) is
> >>>>>>>>>>> currently in
> >>>>>>>>>>> progress. Is there anything blocking us from merging this?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Travis also
> >>>>>>>>>>> released testing on Windows a month ago (
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://blog.travis-ci.com/2018-10-11-windows-early-release).
> >>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps
> >>>>>>>>>>> this is also an option we can look at.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - CALCITE-2322 didn't make it into 1.12.0. I'd like to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> see if we can
> >>>>>>>>>>> reengage Kevin Minder to get this in for 1.13.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There's also an open PR that does not have a JIRA case:
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/76 Let's see
> >>>>>>>>>>> if we can
> >>>>>>>>>>> shepherd this into the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone on the list who would like to be release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager? If
> >>>>>>>>>>> no one is able to, I am happy to act as release manager for
> >>>>>>>>>>> this release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to