+1 for “pull-request-available”. On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:13 PM Jark Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for "pull-request-available" > > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 05:33, Francis Chuang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 for "pull-request-available" > > > > On 8/01/2019 8:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is > > available for a JIRA case. > > > > > > 1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20%3D%20%22Patch%22 > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20flags%20=%20%22Patch%22 > > >. > > > > > > 2. The “pull-request-available” (31 issues); see > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22pull-request-available%22 > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20CALCITE%20AND%20labels%20=%20%22pull-request-available%22 > > >. > > > > > > Should we standardize on one? > > > > > > Which is preferred? > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > > > >
