Broadly I think redundant error msg is much better than nothing, so revert CALCITE-2845 is more accepttable.
It seems the most breaking changes are from [1], but there are no more tests so I just revert CALCITE-2845, and do these check: 1. Revert CALCITE-2845 1. Test Calcite-Avatica master branch locally and passed 2. Change Calcite master's avatica dependency version to 1.15.0-SNAPSHOT and test locally, also passed Are there any other tests that I should do ? I’m wandering if I missed something. [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/blob/b7c6de180aa2f9cfa840504012d42c625595161d/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/avatica/AvaticaConnection.java#L559 Best, Danny Chan 在 2019年5月9日 +0800 AM9:34，Francis Chuang <[email protected]>，写道： > Many thanks, Danny! > > On 9/05/2019 11:33 am, Yuzhao Chen wrote: > > Francis, I will help to take this issue. > > > > Best, > > Danny Chan > > 在 2019年5月9日 +0800 AM6:33，Francis Chuang <[email protected]>，写道： > > > According to the issue, it blocks CALCITE-2817 [1], however CALCITE-2817 > > > was in Calcite 1.19.0, which was released before Avatica 1.14.0. > > > > > > I am happy to revert CALCITE-2845 as I am pretty keen to get the ball > > > rolling for Avatica 1.15.0, but can someone please confirm that it's > > > safe to revert CALCITE-2845? We don't want to end up in a situation > > > where Avatica 1.15.0 is broken and ends up blocking Avatica-Go and > > > Calcite again. > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2817 > > > > > > On 8/05/2019 11:56 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > > > > Since nobody is actively working on CALCITE-3040 and we would like to > > > > release 1.15.0 relatively soon, the only viable solution is to revert > > > > CALCITE-2845, hoping that people who downloaded 1.14.0 are not making > > > > changes to their code based on that. > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:29 AM Francis Chuang > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Could someone please have a look at CALCITE-3040 [1]? > > > > > > > > > > CALCITE-3040 is a blocker for 1.15.0 and I can make rc0 available for > > > > > voting once it's fixed. > > > > > > > > > > Francis > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3040 > > > > > > > > > > On 1/05/2019 10:47 am, Francis Chuang wrote: > > > > > > After Avatica 1.14.0 was released, it was reported that the fix for > > > > > > CALCITE-2845 [1] broke some existing clients. This is currently > > > > > > being > > > > > > tracked in CALCITE-3040 [2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > We need to release Avatica 1.15.0 to fix this issue, so that > > > > > > Calcite can > > > > > > upgrade its version of Avatica. > > > > > > > > > > > > While this is a tiny release, it's also possible to include other > > > > > > fixes, > > > > > > if required. Other than CALCITE-3040, are there any other issues you > > > > > > guys would like to see fixed? > > > > > > > > > > > > Francis > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2845 > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3040 > > > > > > > > > > >
