Good point Vladimir. Given that Java 9 reached already the end of its life I think we should remove it from our CI.
Other than that I am curious to understand why the problem appeared now to better prevent such situations in the future. On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:22 PM Vladimir Sitnikov < [email protected]> wrote: > Just a side note: do we really need/want to support Java 9? > > What if we just skip Java9 and stick with Java 8, 11, and later EAP > eversions? > Does anybody really uses Java 9 in production? > What's the purpose of supporting that? > > Frankly speaking, "Java 9" related failures are a pure noise to me. > The mail is generic like "Calcite build fails", and it really sad it > notifies lots of people as "build failure" for such a tiny event (==Java9 > failed somehow). > > Vladimir >
