Hi Rui, Thanks a lot for the details and pointers. Shuyi
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:25 PM Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Shuyi, > > Julian should know better on the effort of standardizing streaming SQL into > the standard. > > > Regarding the engineering effort: I am trying to drive the implementation > in both Calcite and Beam. Current TUMBLE as a table-valued function is > working in Calcite master [1] while HOP and SESSION are in a PR [2] that is > pending for review. I raised an open discussion for EMIT syntax[3]. You can > also check the umbrella jira of this effort[4]. > > > [1]:https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1481, > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1587 > [2]:https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1761 > [3]: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5bd9a6f7af2c0cd81aecd4de512fd889fbf15f112cc3704f188b1d4f%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E > [4]:https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3271 > > > -Rui > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:14 PM Shuyi Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am wondering what the current status of Streaming SQL standardization > is. > > Has the work presented at the "One SQL to Rule Them All" SIGMOD paper > being > > standardized as ANSI/INCITS SQL, or what the current status is? Are there > > any plan in Calcite/Beam/Flink to support the standards if so? AFAIK, > there > > is a BEAM proposal > > < > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/138uA7VTpbF84CFrd--cz3YVe0-AQ9ALnsavaSE2JeE4/edit#heading=h.f7eonhc93kwo > > > > > in > > the BEAM community to move towards the new Streaming SQL extension. > Thanks > > a lot. > > > > -- > > Shuyi Chen > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/shuyi-chen-pku/ > > > -- Shuyi Chen https://www.linkedin.com/in/shuyi-chen-pku/
