I already fix that

Julian Hyde <[email protected]>于2020年3月11日 周三上午2:00写道:

> Danny,
>
> Can you fix the tag please?
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Mar 6, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The RexNode normalization and project names remove from digest did
> change
> > a lot of plan from the Apache Flink side
> >
> > Hey Danny, I see it is dissatisfying, however, it is really sad you have
> > never revealed which plans required changes and why.
> >
> >> The java doc doesn’t distinguish main API and test API, they are just
> > together [1]
> >
> > I do not see "test API" there. Can you please clarify?
> >
> >> • The calcite-core does not publish the test sources now, should we add
> it
> > back ?
> >
> > We should **drop** publishing test artifacts via classifiers.
> > The problem with classifier-style approach is those artifacts can't
> declare
> > their dependencies.
> >
> > We have already discussed it, and there was an agreement that we could
> > extract calcite-test-framework or something like that.
> > It could come as a separate artifact with its own properly-declared
> > dependencies, sources, etc, etc.
> >
> >> Do we need to put the credit (commit name) after each commit message ?
> It
> > seems many projects put the credits in the last part together of the
> > release note
> >
> > I think we should stop adding (contributor name) in the commit message.
> > Git does have a proper field for the author's name. Of course committers
> > need to ensure they don't overwrite that field by accident.
> >
> > Now we have Gradle, so we could even automate certain tasks.
> > For instance, it could process Git history and build a list of
> > contributors, etc, etc.
> >
> >
> >> The RC artifacts was removed when I do the release, which actually I
> think
> > should not do, one awkward thing is that my network sucks
> >
> > What do you mean by "RC artifacts removed"?
> > Release plugin does svn **MOVE** from repos/dist/dev to
> repos/dist/release/
> > This makes it clear that the release artifacts are the same as the ones
> > used for vote.
> >
> >
> > Vladimir
>
>

Reply via email to