I suggest keeping master closed to get some resources on this
important issue. Yes, it is a form of blackmail.

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:26 PM Chunwei Lei <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There're some PRs which have been a long time. I suggest closing some of
> them if nobody are working on it.
> But I don't figure out why we should keep the master branch closed. To
> avoid conflict?
>
>
> Best,
> Chunwei
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:22 AM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I noticed that yesterday Haisheng removed the ‘fix in 1.23’ labels from
> > several JIRA cases. I support this - we need to get a release out - but I
> > don’t want to lose the fact that many of these cases had PRs and were ready
> > to merge to master.
> >
> > We all know that we have a backlog of PRs. There are good contributions
> > that are not being merged to master because we have too few reviewers.
> >
> > I would like to propose a solution. After 1.23 is released, keep the
> > master branch closed until we have gone through the backlog of PRs. (Not
> > all PRs, just those that were tagged ‘fix for 1.23’. And we don’t have to
> > merge them all - we can reject them if not ready.)
> >
> > Committers who work on Calcite daily will have a strong incentive to work
> > on other peoples’ PRs.
> >
> > If there are other suggestions for addressing this problem, I would like
> > to hear them.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >

Reply via email to