>The name Hasher implies that it would be an object. Could it not be just a set of static methods?
Do you have naming suggestions? I think Objects would be worse as it would conflict with j.u.Objects. >Is there a library that does this for us? I am afraid it would be easier/faster to just write it instead of search for an existing implementation. On top of that, it would be a natural fit for unorderedHash which is way less likely to be available in existing libraries. Vladimir
