Thanks. I will prepare my local test as fast as possible.

Ruben Q L <[email protected]>于2020年9月25日 周五下午4:30写道:

> Danny,
>
> I will do my best to have a RC by the end of next week (this is my first
>
> time as release manager, I hope I do not find any setbacks in the process).
>
> Unfortunately I cannot promise a date for the release (I think nobody can),
>
> because other factors need to be considered (the vote, if several RCs need
>
> to be generated until one gets finally approved, etc). Having said that,
>
> 8th October seems reasonable, but again, I cannot promise anything.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ruben
>
>
>
>
>
> Le ven. 25 sept. 2020 à 09:05, Danny Chan <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>
>
> > Ruben , can we make sure that the next release happens before 8th
> October?
>
> > I would do local tests for it before that.
>
> >
>
> > Ruben Q L <[email protected]>于2020年9月24日 周四上午2:32写道:
>
> >
>
> > > Allright, I will send a separate email to start the "official"
> discussion
>
> > >
>
> > > for 1.26.0.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Best,
>
> > >
>
> > > Ruben
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Le mer. 23 sept. 2020 à 17:17, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> a écrit
> :
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > I agree, this is a good time for a release. Remember that releases
>
> > >
>
> > > > always take a week or two longer than we think.
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > Danny, I need your help on
>
> > >
>
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4259 (supporting JDK
> 15
>
> > >
>
> > > > and removing log4j), which is a must-fix for 1.26.
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > Julian
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:30 AM Danny Chan <[email protected]>
>
> > wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > Thanks so much, Ruben ~
>
> > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > Can the RC date be one week in advance, say about 3th-8th October,
>
> > >
>
> > > > because I need some time for the upgrade of Flink side.
>
> > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > Before the RC, I need amount of local tests for Flink and I would
>
> > have
>
> > >
>
> > > > to make sure that the 1.26.0 is production ready for the nest Flink
>
> > > release.
>
> > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > And it would be great if we can make this sooner, this is important
>
> > >
>
> > > > because I can fire the upgrade PR sooner and actually we have many
>
> > > features
>
> > >
>
> > > > developed based on current master branch.
>
> > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > Best,
>
> > >
>
> > > > > Danny Chan
>
> > >
>
> > > > > 在 2020年9月23日 +0800 PM4:15,Ruben Q L <[email protected]>,写道:
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > Hello Danny,
>
> > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > As the release manager for 1.26.0, I think what you say sounds
>
> > >
>
> > > > reasonable.
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > We had 1.25 around mid-August, I think we could definitely aim
>
> > > mid/end
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > October for 1.26. I would propose to have a RC by 10th-15th
>
> > October.
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > According to the Jira dashboard [1] there are still 6 unresolved
>
> > >
>
> > > > issues,
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > let us try to focus on that before adding new stuff into the next
>
> > >
>
> > > > version.
>
> > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > Best regards,
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > Ruben
>
> > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > [1]
>
> > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
> > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > Le mer. 23 sept. 2020 à 06:31, Danny Chan <[email protected]>
> a
>
> > >
>
> > > > écrit :
>
> > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > > Is there any possibility that 1.26.0 can be released in the
>
> > > following
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > > weeks, e.g. within the October ?
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > > Apache Flink would release next major version in the end of
>
> > > October,
>
> > >
>
> > > > if we
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > > can use the latest Calcite code, that would be awesome ~
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > > Best,
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > > Danny Chan
>
> > >
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to