Hi, Julian!

Thanks for your reply! I file a ticket for this issue [1].

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4542

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin Orlov




> On 15 Mar 2021, at 19:56, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Can you please log a bug? Describe symptoms, not what’s happening in the code.
> 
> (I don’t remember what “derive” is, even though I probably wrote it.)
> 
> Log the bug before you have a solution, and you’ll write a better bug.
> 
>> On Mar 15, 2021, at 6:08 AM, Konstantin Orlov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all!
>> 
>> I did a reproducer for mentioned case, and possible fix (at least it fixes 
>> this particular problem). [1]
>> 
>> Could someone verify please is provided reproducer/fix valid?
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://github.com/korlov42/calcite/commit/f4a5c2f01e0ec67156f7e91c6b5839dca1db6776
>>  
>> <https://github.com/korlov42/calcite/commit/f4a5c2f01e0ec67156f7e91c6b5839dca1db6776>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Konstantin Orlov
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 5 Mar 2021, at 19:53, Konstantin Orlov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, folks!
>>> 
>>> I am facing the problem that derive is not being called for some newly 
>>> created relations. 
>>> 
>>> We have a several join algorithms, so we implemented a several physical 
>>> nodes. During an optimization process they all are created from a logical 
>>> join with default distribution trait and then they are converted to a 
>>> single distribution by a passThrough call. But derive is invoked only for 
>>> the first physical rel, because others relations after conversion from a 
>>> logical rel are added to the already optimized subset (subset.taskState == 
>>> OPTIMIZED).
>>> 
>>> A derive invocation is important for us, because we create a different 
>>> variations of distribution here (like colocated join, sending one side to 
>>> another or full rehashing).
>>> 
>>> So the questions are:
>>> 1) Is it a bug or it so by design?
>>> 2) if this was done on purpose, how can we best get around this limitation?
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Regards,
>>> Konstantin Orlov
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to