Sure. Contributions welcome.

> On Jun 2, 2021, at 1:23 PM, James Starr <jamesst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If it is de facto deprecated, then could it not just be deprecated with a
> comment stating why it has not been deleted?  Calcite seems to have several
> API that are defacto deprecated and there is no way of knowing by reading
> the code.  This would personally have made me much simpler for myself to
> get ramped on the calcite code base.
> 
> James
> 
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 12:07 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Master is a moving target. Apparently you are using a version of the
>> code from sometime in March. These links work better:
>> 
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/796675c9b33e0461bc45a72780162d474a4b098b/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql2rel/SqlToRelConverter.java#L2881
>> 
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/796675c9b33e0461bc45a72780162d474a4b098b/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql2rel/SqlToRelConverter.java#L6209
>> 
>> I don't know the exact cause of what you are seeing, but when you set
>> "expand=false" you are choosing a newer (and better) code path. We do
>> not have feature parity between the code paths. Nor do we write tests
>> for both code paths.
>> 
>> Some day I'd like to officially deprecate, then obsolete,
>> "expand=true". It is de facto deprecated because we put more effort
>> into the "expand=false" path.
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:19 AM stanilovsky evgeny
>> <estanilovs...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, calciters )
>>> 
>>> I am trying to figure out why DeduplicateCorrelateVariables [1] is called
>>> only if withExpand [2] flag is true ? Why we don`t need to deduplicate in
>>> appropriate case ?
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql2rel/SqlToRelConverter.java#L2881
>>> 
>>> [2]
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql2rel/SqlToRelConverter.java#L6209
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>> 

Reply via email to