> Shouldn't we remove the assertion above? Perhaps. Or perhaps the rel2Subset mapping is not up to date.
Regards, Haisheng Yuan On 2021/06/06 13:09:16, Vladimir Ozerov <ppoze...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When doing a trait derivation in the non-OMAKASE mode, the following lines > of code are invoked: > 1: RelSubset relSubset = planner.register(newRel, rel); > 2: assert relSubset.set == planner.getSubset(rel).set; > > The assertion on the second line may fail because the "newRel" is assigned > not the "rel" set, but "rel" *canonical set*, which might be different. > > As a workaround, we may change the derive mode to OMAKASE. In this case, we > do not hit the assertion and planning completes successfully. > > Shouldn't we remove the assertion above? > > Regards, > Vladimir. >
