Definitely. I'm also trying to add helpful comments in a couple of key
javadoc locations.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:02 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for following through on this large change, Jacques. Be sure to
> document the changes people will need to make if they have defined their
> own rules.
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 2021, at 12:59 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm hoping (fingers crossed) to have the final Immutables patch up today
> > and if all goes well, get that merged before the release.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:34 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> So, the vote for Avatica 1.19 is underway, and we will likely have a
> >> release in 4 or 5 days.
> >>
> >> Next up, Calcite release 1.28. I'll be release manager for that too, and
> >> I'd like to start the vote in a week. I have three asks:
> >>
> >> 1. Start stabilizing the build. If you have a change that might cause
> >> build instability, ask on the dev list before you commit it. The recent
> >> changes for Gradle, JDK 16/17 and Immutables have been destabilizing,
> so I
> >> ask those authors
> >>
> >> 2. I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4835. If
> >> you have made breaking changes since 1.27, please document them in that
> >> case, and I will add them to the release notes. If there are bugs that
> MUST
> >> be fixed in 1.28, link to them from that case.
> >>
> >> 3. Can I have a few volunteers to go through the PRs and merge any that
> >> are ready? (Please reply to this email, so we know you are working on
> it.)
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/09/27 19:21:51, Alessandro Solimando <
> >> alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>> I have prepared the PR, you can find it here:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/154.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Alessandro
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 20:27, Alessandro Solimando <
> >>> alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Julian,
> >>>> I can help with PR-143
> >>>> <https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/143>, since I have
> >>>> contributed to the modified classes in the past.
> >>>>
> >>>> I will still need a committer to merge but I can rebase on master and
> >> fix
> >>>> issues, if any.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Alessandro
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 07:52, Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can people please try to review and merge the Avatica PRs this week?
> >>>>> Several look ready:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pulls
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Julian
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sep 24, 2021, at 6:22 PM, Haisheng Yuan <hy...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sounds good!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2021/09/25 01:13:26, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I propose to start a vote for Avatica 1.19 one week from now, and a
> >>>>>>> vote for Calcite 1.28 two weeks from now. I'll be RM for both. How
> >>>>>>> does that timing sound?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Julian
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:12 AM James Starr <jamesst...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> When is calcite planning on going to 2.0?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:35 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <
> >>>>> zabe...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> From the last discussion [1], the list was the following for
> >> Calcite:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde for 1.28.0
> >>>>>>>>> Rui Wang for 1.29.0
> >>>>>>>>> Andrei Sereda for 1.30.0
> >>>>>>>>> Liya Fan for 1.31.0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r86eead4dc703200c0f7182632bad79198d9c3fab006358c6e7dae8e8%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 6:36 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We're about due for releases of Avatica and Calcite. Who's next
> >> up
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> the release manager schedule?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to