I assume that some of the filter conditions (which are involved in the choice of partitions ) may by pushdown'ed to TableScan
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:29 PM Константин Новиков <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Given some partitioned storage, we can omit the scan of some partitions > when a filter is present. How can the lower cost of the scan be > represented? As far as I can tell the current approach only allows > providing a single cost for the TableScan and Filter can only add to > that. Should my implementation provide a rule that combines > Filter+TableScan? >
