Should a jira case be logged for this issue? Or is there an existing case? If 
the latter, should we add a stack trace to help people tie it to this problem?

A jira URL in this thread will help other people who run into this problem in 
future. Right now it is just a rambling email thread with an off-topic subject.

Julian

> On Feb 25, 2022, at 7:18 AM, Gavin Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Also I just checked and this is updated on master so it should be solved in
> next release FWIW:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/cbbe5701b7f61d7f8df12d314ba5aabf898c1cae/gradle.properties#L116
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:16 AM Gavin Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> The fix for this is just to add janino and commons-compiler as exclusions
>> in the calcite/avatica dependencies
>> And then add the updated version so that it overwrites them
>> 
>> I tested this on your code and it worked
>> 
>> Also, please listen to Stamatis/Julian advice
>> 
>> <dependencies>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.calcite</groupId>
>> <artifactId>calcite-core</artifactId>
>> <version>1.29.0</version>
>> <exclusions>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>janino</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>commons-compiler</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> </exclusions>
>> </dependency>
>> 
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.calcite.avatica</groupId>
>> <artifactId>avatica-core</artifactId>
>> <version>1.20.0</version>
>> <exclusions>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>janino</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>commons-compiler</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> </exclusions>
>> </dependency>
>> 
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.calcite</groupId>
>> <artifactId>calcite-file</artifactId>
>> <version>1.29.0</version>
>> <exclusions>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>janino</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>commons-compiler</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> </exclusions>
>> </dependency>
>> 
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.calcite</groupId>
>> <artifactId>calcite-example-csv</artifactId>
>> <version>1.21.0</version>
>> <exclusions>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>janino</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>commons-compiler</artifactId>
>> </exclusion>
>> </exclusions>
>> </dependency>
>> 
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>janino</artifactId>
>> <version>3.1.6</version>
>> </dependency>
>> 
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.janino</groupId>
>> <artifactId>commons-compiler</artifactId>
>> <version>3.1.6</version>
>> </dependency>
>> </dependencies>
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 9:33 AM xiaobo <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have put the testing code at github
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/guxiaobo/gxb-testing/blob/main/calcite-testing/src/test/java/com/xsmartware/testing/calcite/Test1.java
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiaobo ";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Friday, Feb 25, 2022 9:05 PM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re:        calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> Now we come to the  problem similar as the one at
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2433#issuecomment-860024076,
>>> 
>>> a simple sql "select max(id) from s.t1" caused the following exception,
>>> users report upgrading janino to 3.1.6 can fix this problem, but as we
>>> discussed before janino 3.1.6 is not fully compatible with calcite 1.29.0
>>> because of the dependency issue.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>        at org.apache.calcite.avatica.Helper.wrap(Helper.java:37)
>>> ~[avatica-core-1.20.0.jar:1.20.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.adapter.enumerable.EnumerableInterpretable.toBindable(EnumerableInterpretable.java:130)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl$CalcitePreparingStmt.implement(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:1130)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl$CalcitePreparingStmt.prepare_(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:1032)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl$CalcitePreparingStmt.prepareRel(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:988)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl.prepare2_(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:668)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl.prepare_(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:513)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl.prepareSql(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:483)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.jdbc.CalciteConnectionImpl.parseQuery(CalciteConnectionImpl.java:249)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.jdbc.CalciteConnectionImpl.prepareStatement_(CalciteConnectionImpl.java:229)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        ... 13 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException:
>>> Compiling "Baz" in File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 1,
>>> Column 1: File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 41,
>>> Column 45: Compiling "bind(org.apache.calcite.DataContext root)": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 60,
>>> Column 64
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:369)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$000(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$1.visitCompilationUnit(UnitCompiler.java:333)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$1.visitCompilationUnit(UnitCompiler.java:330)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at org.codehaus.janino.Java$CompilationUnit.accept(Java.java:367)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileUnit(UnitCompiler.java:330)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.SimpleCompiler.cook(SimpleCompiler.java:245)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.ClassBodyEvaluator.cook(ClassBodyEvaluator.java:294)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.ClassBodyEvaluator.cook(ClassBodyEvaluator.java:288)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.ClassBodyEvaluator.cook(ClassBodyEvaluator.java:267)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at org.codehaus.commons.compiler.Cookable.cook(Cookable.java:52)
>>> ~[commons-compiler-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.ClassBodyEvaluator.createInstance(ClassBodyEvaluator.java:428)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.adapter.enumerable.EnumerableInterpretable.getBindable(EnumerableInterpretable.java:166)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        at
>>> org.apache.calcite.adapter.enumerable.EnumerableInterpretable.toBindable(EnumerableInterpretable.java:127)
>>> ~[calcite-core-1.29.0.jar:1.29.0]
>>>        ... 21 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 41,
>>> Column 45: Compiling "bind(org.apache.calcite.DataContext root)": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 60,
>>> Column 64
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:3222)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMethods(UnitCompiler.java:1379)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMethods(UnitCompiler.java:1352)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:800)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:412)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$400(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitPackageMemberClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:391)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitPackageMemberClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:386)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$PackageMemberClassDeclaration.accept(Java.java:1692)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:386)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:359)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        ... 34 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 60,
>>> Column 64
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:2639)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$2700(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationStatement(UnitCompiler.java:1539)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitLocalVariableDeclarationStatement(UnitCompiler.java:1523)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$LocalVariableDeclarationStatement.accept(Java.java:3840)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1523)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileStatements(UnitCompiler.java:1607)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:3531)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:3218)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        ... 44 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 60,
>>> Column 80: Compiling "new
>>> org.apache.calcite.adapter.enumerable.BasicAggregateLambdaFactory(new
>>> org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.Function0() { ... },
>>> accumulatorAdders)": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 61,
>>> Column 5: Compiling "new org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.Function0() {
>>> ... }": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 62,
>>> Column 21: Compiling "apply()": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 70,
>>> Column 17: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: Operand
>>> stack underflow
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue(UnitCompiler.java:5731)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:2622)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        ... 52 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 61,
>>> Column 5: Compiling "new org.apache.calcite.linq4j.function.Function0() {
>>> ... }": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 62,
>>> Column 21: Compiling "apply()": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 70,
>>> Column 17: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: Operand
>>> stack underflow
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue(UnitCompiler.java:5731)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.invokeConstructor(UnitCompiler.java:8297)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:5468)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$9700(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$15.visitNewClassInstance(UnitCompiler.java:4643)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$15.visitNewClassInstance(UnitCompiler.java:4604)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$NewClassInstance.accept(Java.java:5560)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet(UnitCompiler.java:4604)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue(UnitCompiler.java:5729)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        ... 53 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 62,
>>> Column 21: Compiling "apply()": File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 70,
>>> Column 17: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: Operand
>>> stack underflow
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:3222)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMethods(UnitCompiler.java:1379)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMethods(UnitCompiler.java:1352)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:800)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:977)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:947)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$200(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitAnonymousClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:389)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitAnonymousClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:386)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$AnonymousClassDeclaration.accept(Java.java:1375)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:386)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet2(UnitCompiler.java:5571)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$9400(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$15.visitNewAnonymousClassInstance(UnitCompiler.java:4640)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$15.visitNewAnonymousClassInstance(UnitCompiler.java:4604)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$NewAnonymousClassInstance.accept(Java.java:5608)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGet(UnitCompiler.java:4604)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileGetValue(UnitCompiler.java:5729)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        ... 61 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: File
>>> '/Users/linda/Downloads/janino/janino6606844895950068558.java', Line 70,
>>> Column 17: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException: Operand
>>> stack underflow
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:2393)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$1800(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitExpressionStatement(UnitCompiler.java:1530)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$6.visitExpressionStatement(UnitCompiler.java:1523)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.Java$ExpressionStatement.accept(Java.java:3198)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:1523)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileStatements(UnitCompiler.java:1607)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:3531)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:3218)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        ... 78 common frames omitted
>>> Caused by: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.InternalCompilerException:
>>> Operand stack underflow
>>>        at org.codehaus.janino.StackMap.peekOperand(StackMap.java:94)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.popOperand(CodeContext.java:1349)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.putfield(UnitCompiler.java:12363)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileSet2(UnitCompiler.java:6498)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$13400(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$20.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler.java:6480)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$20.visitFieldAccess(UnitCompiler.java:6475)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at org.codehaus.janino.Java$FieldAccess.accept(Java.java:4668)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileSet(UnitCompiler.java:6475)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileSet2(UnitCompiler.java:6489)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$13200(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$20.visitAmbiguousName(UnitCompiler.java:6478)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$20.visitAmbiguousName(UnitCompiler.java:6475)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at org.codehaus.janino.Java$AmbiguousName.accept(Java.java:4574)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileSet(UnitCompiler.java:6475)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:3992)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$6000(UnitCompiler.java:231)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitAssignment(UnitCompiler.java:3944)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$12.visitAssignment(UnitCompiler.java:3924)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at org.codehaus.janino.Java$Assignment.accept(Java.java:4835)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:3924)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        at
>>> org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:2391)
>>> ~[janino-3.1.4.jar:na]
>>>        ... 86 common frames omitted
>>> 
>>> With janino 3.1.4
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiaobo ";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Saturday, Feb 12, 2022 9:14 PM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re:       calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 3.1.4 of janino and commons-compiler works now.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiaobo ";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Saturday, Feb 12, 2022 8:04 PM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re:      calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> but strange enough, the same code works in a single thread.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiaobo ";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Saturday, Feb 12, 2022 8:02 PM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re:     calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> we checked the janino release note page
>>> http://janino-compiler.github.io/janino/changelog.html
>>> 
>>> Fixed issue #141: Unable to find org.codehaus.commons.compiler.properties
>>> in java 11: ICompilerFactories were loaded through the current thread's
>>> "context class loader", which is a bad choice in some environments. Thus,
>>> the methods "getDefaultCompilerFactory()", "getAllCompilerFactories()" and
>>> "getCompilerFactory(className)" were duplicated and augmented with a
>>> "classLoader" parameter.
>>> 
>>> what does this mean?  the getDefaultCompilerFactory method with a
>>> classloader parameter was removed intentionally?
>>> but it seems calcite still needs it , so what version of janino should we
>>> use for the latest calcite-core?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiaobo ";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Saturday, Feb 12, 2022 12:01 PM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re:    calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In our use case, the Java class which opens calcite connection is
>>> contained in a external Java jar file, which is loaded dynamicly through
>>> classloaders other than the default systemloader like this:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> try {
>>>            ClassLoader loader = URLClassLoader.newInstance(
>>>                    new URL[] { new URL("jar:file:" + path + "!/") },
>>>                    getClass().getClassLoader());
>>>            Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(classPath, true, loader);
>>> 
>>> we mention this because the error message shows a classloader parameter.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiaobo ";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Saturday, Feb 12, 2022 11:56 AM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re:   calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And if we remove calcite from our project,  janino is not in "resolved
>>> depencies" library list of pom.xml,
>>> So we think it not the janino conflic problem.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiaobo ";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Saturday, Feb 12, 2022 9:49 AM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re:  calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> can you share the solution for the problem, we are using the following
>>> libraries, and it seems janino 3.1.6  is only dependent by calcite-core.
>>> 
>>>    <properties>
>>> 
>>> <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
>>>          <maven.compiler.encoding>UTF-8</maven.compiler.encoding>
>>>          <java.version>9</java.version>
>>>          <maven.compiler.source>9</maven.compiler.source>
>>>          <maven.compiler.target>9</maven.compiler.target>
>>>        <log4j2.version>2.17.1</log4j2.version>
>>>        <drools.version>7.64.0.Final</drools.version>
>>>   </properties>
>>> 
>>> <groupId>org.apache.calcite</groupId>
>>>            <artifactId>calcite-core</artifactId>
>>>            <version>1.29.0</version>
>>>        </dependency>
>>>        <dependency>
>>>            <groupId>org.apache.calcite.avatica</groupId>
>>>            <artifactId>avatica-core</artifactId>
>>>            <version>1.20.0</version>
>>>        </dependency>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    <dependency>
>>>            <groupId>org.drools</groupId>
>>>            <artifactId>drools-core</artifactId>
>>>            <version>${drools.version}</version>
>>>        </dependency>
>>>        <dependency>
>>>            <groupId>org.drools</groupId>
>>>            <artifactId>drools-compiler</artifactId>
>>>            <version>${drools.version}</version>
>>>        </dependency>
>>>        <dependency>
>>>            <groupId>org.drools</groupId>
>>>            <artifactId>drools-decisiontables</artifactId>
>>>            <version>${drools.version}</version>
>>>        </dependency>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>>> From:  "xiong duan";<[email protected]>;
>>> Send time: Saturday, Feb 12, 2022 8:43 AM
>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re: calcite multi-threading problem
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yes, It is a dependency issue. I have met the same problem. +1 for Dmitry.
>>> 
>>> Dmitry Sysolyatin <[email protected]> 于2022年2月11日周五 21:18写道:
>>> 
>>>> Actually, I had the same problem with spark. Spark 3.2.1 uses the old
>>>> version of janino, calcite 1.29 uses the new version of janino and they
>>> are
>>>> not compatible.
>>>> If I downgrade janino version to version which spark uses I got an error
>>>> not method found exception
>>>> If I upgrade the janino version to the version which calcite uses I get
>>> the
>>>> same error but with another method.
>>>> 
>>>> As a result, I built a separate calcite jar package where I shaded
>>> janino
>>>> dependency
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 2:39 PM stanilovsky evgeny <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> for example on a current calcite branch:
>>>>> grep janino gradle.properties
>>>>> janino.version=3.1.6
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> yes, we use drools in the same project,&nbsp; and drools uses janino
>>>>>> too, is there a version list of janino which calcite supports?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---Original---
>>>>>> From: "Dmitry Sysolyatin"<[email protected]&gt;
>>>>>> Date: Fri, Feb 11, 2022 18:30 PM
>>>>>> To: "dev"<[email protected]&gt;;
>>>>>> Subject: Re: calcite multi-threading problem
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> It&nbsp;looks&nbsp;like&nbsp;a&nbsp;dependency&nbsp;issue,&nbsp;not&nbsp;like&nbsp;a&nbsp;multi-threading&nbsp;issue.&nbsp;Most
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> likely&nbsp;you&nbsp;have&nbsp;some&nbsp;dependency&nbsp;that&nbsp;use&nbsp;another&nbsp;version&nbsp;of&nbsp;janino&nbsp;but
>>>>>> calcite&nbsp;requires&nbsp;another&nbsp;one
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> On&nbsp;Fri,&nbsp;Feb&nbsp;11,&nbsp;2022&nbsp;at&nbsp;12:18&nbsp;PM&nbsp;xiaobo&nbsp;<[email protected]
>>>>> &gt;&nbsp;wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> &gt;&nbsp;Hi,
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> &gt;&nbsp;we&nbsp;open&nbsp;a&nbsp;calcite&nbsp;connection&nbsp;with&nbsp;ReflectiveSchema&nbsp;in&nbsp;one&nbsp;thread,&nbsp;and
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> &gt;&nbsp;execute&nbsp;sqls&nbsp;in&nbsp;other&nbsp;&nbsp;threads&nbsp;against&nbsp;the&nbsp;connection,&nbsp;but&nbsp;failed&nbsp;with
>>>>>> &gt;&nbsp;this&nbsp;error
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> &gt;&nbsp;com.google.common.util.concurrent.ExecutionError:
>>>>>> &gt;&nbsp;java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> &gt;&nbsp;org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompilerFactoryFactory.getDefaultCompilerFactory(Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;)
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> &gt;&nbsp;Lorg/codehaus/commons/compiler/ICompilerFactory;
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> &gt;
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> &gt;&nbsp;do&nbsp;we&nbsp;miss&nbsp;anything&nbsp;regarding&nbsp;to&nbsp;multi-threading&nbsp;with&nbsp;calcite?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to