Thanks Andrei for being RM.

- Checksum and signature: ok
- Gradle test: ok
- Calcite-based application test suite: ok
- I confirm the diff issues already described by Stamatis, not sure if this
should be a blocking problem or not.

My vote is: 0 (binding)

Best,
Ruben


On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:07 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, jdk1.8.0_261, Gradle wrapper, Gradle 7.4.2
>
>  * Checked signatures and checksums OK
>  * Went over release note OK (left some comments in the draft PR)
>  * Built from git tag and run tests (./gradlew clean build) OK
>  * Built from source artifacts and run unit tests + slow tests OK
>  * Checked diff between git repo and release sources KO
>
> Comparing the contents between the git repo and the release sources I found
> that the (RC0) sources contain two (empty) directories (i.e., arrow, .mvn)
> that shouldn't be there.
> I guess there was some kind of stale state in the calcite directory when
> preparing the RC. The command that I used to compare the sources can be
> found below.
>
> $ diff -qr apache-calcite-1.31.0-src apache-calcite-1.31.0-git
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-src: arrow
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-git: .git
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-git/gradle: wrapper
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-git: gradlew
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-git: gradlew.bat
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-src: licenses
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-src: .mvn
> Only in apache-calcite-1.31.0-git/site: fonts
>
> The rest of the differences look normal and have been discussed previously.
>
> 0 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:46 AM Francis Chuang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for being RM for this release, Andrei.
> >
> > My vote is: +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Verified GPG signature - OK
> > - Verified SHA512 - OK
> > - Checked release notes on tag
> > (
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.31.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> )
> >
> > - OK
> > - Ran tests (gradle check) - OK
> > - Spot checked Nexus artifacts - OK
> >
> > Environment:
> > Eclipse-temurin:17-jammy docker container in WSL2 (Ubuntu 20.04) on
> > Windows 10 21h2
> >
> >  > docker version
> > Client: Docker Engine - Community
> >   Cloud integration: v1.0.24
> >   Version:           20.10.17
> >   API version:       1.41
> >   Go version:        go1.17.11
> >   Git commit:        100c701
> >   Built:             Mon Jun  6 23:03:17 2022
> >   OS/Arch:           linux/amd64
> >   Context:           default
> >   Experimental:      true
> >
> > Server: Docker Desktop
> >   Engine:
> >    Version:          20.10.17
> >    API version:      1.41 (minimum version 1.12)
> >    Go version:       go1.17.11
> >    Git commit:       a89b842
> >    Built:            Mon Jun  6 23:01:23 2022
> >    OS/Arch:          linux/amd64
> >    Experimental:     false
> >   containerd:
> >    Version:          1.6.6
> >    GitCommit:        10c12954828e7c7c9b6e0ea9b0c02b01407d3ae1
> >   runc:
> >    Version:          1.1.2
> >    GitCommit:        v1.1.2-0-ga916309
> >   docker-init:
> >    Version:          0.19.0
> >    GitCommit:        de40ad0
> >
> >  > gradle -v
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Gradle 7.4.2
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Build time:   2022-03-31 15:25:29 UTC
> > Revision:     540473b8118064efcc264694cbcaa4b677f61041
> >
> > Kotlin:       1.5.31
> > Groovy:       3.0.9
> > Ant:          Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.11 compiled on July 10 2021
> > JVM:          17.0.3 (Eclipse Adoptium 17.0.3+7)
> > OS:           Linux 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 amd64
> >
> >  > java -version
> > openjdk version "17.0.3" 2022-04-19
> > OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.3+7 (build 17.0.3+7)
> > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.3+7 (build 17.0.3+7, mixed mode,
> > sharing)
> >
> > Regarding the java aggregate docs pointed out by Benchao: I think it
> > should be fine after they are automatically deployed when the release is
> > finalized. The previous version's website was manually deployed, so I
> > think there was a small error in the deployment.
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On 23/07/2022 1:07 pm, Andrei Sereda wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.31.0, release
> > > candidate 0.
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > >
> > > You can read the release notes here:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.31.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> > >
> > > The commit to be voted upon:
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=c416e109460d8e439078206a48057b504b6bb08b
> > >
> > > Its hash is c416e109460d8e439078206a48057b504b6bb08b
> > >
> > > Tag:
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/calcite-1.31.0-rc0
> > >
> > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.31.0-rc0
> > > (revision 55918)
> > >
> > > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > >
> >
> 527e699857958b9d98e733059bd67ca6fc42e75238074dec65cc86caa8f5ae176e269d9ac478754ad206ea2336289a8f40f37ee86818130b37b53a53ee79bb2c
> > > *apache-calcite-1.31.0-src.tar.gz
> > >
> > > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1166/org/apache/calcite/
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > >
> > > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "gradle build"
> > > (requires an appropriate Gradle/JDK installation)
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.31.0.
> > >
> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.31.0
> > > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Here is my vote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to