+1

Le lun. 12 sept. 2022 à 00:36, Justin Swanhart <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> +1
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 10:50 AM Gavin Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Understandable, no worries =)
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 2:49 AM Dmitry Sysolyatin <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > unfortunately, I can't reveal the details of the implementation until
> our
> > > company has given the official right to make this project open source
> :(
> > >
> > > > 10 сент. 2022 г., в 20:16, Gavin Ray <[email protected]>
> > написал(а):
> > > >
> > > > Did you wind up using CrateDB's PG implementation?
> > > > I found it was too tied to CrateDB specific stuff, not really usable
> > > > without trying to rewrite a lot of it
> > > >
> > > > So instead I wrote a framework where you can implement an interface
> for
> > > > handling each
> > > > PG wire message type and it does the rest (encoding/decoding,
> > networking,
> > > > etc) using Netty
> > > >
> > > > (I published it here, it's in Kotlin but I also have a Java version I
> > > mean
> > > > to publish this weekend)
> > > > GavinRay97/PgProtoKt: A framework for building Postgres Wire-Protocol
> > > > backends on the JVM, backed by Netty (github.com)
> > > > <https://github.com/GavinRay97/PgProtoKt#example>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:10 PM Dmitry Sysolyatin <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Our first implementation is also used external PG. But there were 3
> > > >> problem with that:
> > > >> 1. Need external pg setup like you said
> > > >> 2. Need to synchronise external pg with list of your tables and
> > columns
> > > >> 3. Security, it is hard to do any security related things on top of
> > > >> external Postgres pg_catalog table. For example, to show user only
> his
> > > >> tables, schemas and so on, so on
> > > >>
> > > >>>> 10 сент. 2022 г., в 18:58, Gavin Ray <[email protected]>
> > > написал(а):
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have a basic JVM framework for building PG wire protocol
> services
> > > >> that is
> > > >>> integrated with Calcite
> > > >>> But it does not support pg_catalog, more just passes queries
> directly
> > > to
> > > >>> Calcite
> > > >>>
> > > >>> A hacky way to add support for pg_catalog is to use pg_fdw with a
> > real
> > > >>> Postgres DB so that it takes care of the metadata
> > > >>> But this is not ideal and it requires having an external Postgres
> > data
> > > +
> > > >>> some setup
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 11:55 AM Gavin Ray <[email protected]
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 11:30 AM Dmitry Sysolyatin <
> > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hello!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I've been working on the integration calcite and PostgreSQL wire
> > > >> protocol
> > > >>>>> [1] to emulate Postgres server (Of course it includes emulating
> > > >>>>> `pg_catalog` schema). It gives a user the ability to connect to a
> > > >> calcite
> > > >>>>> schema using PostgreSQL tools and libraries.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Our team is thinking to open source code of this project. And at
> > > >> first, we
> > > >>>>> would like to know if anyone would be interested before doing any
> > > next
> > > >>>>> steps.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> If you would be interested in, just write +1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol.html
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to