+1, it would reduce a lot of noise. Best, Dan Zou
> 2023年4月19日 19:37，Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 写道： > > +1, > > One thing that may affect current workflow is sometimes I only watch the > Jira, and will get notified from the PR notification. If we are going to > disable it, I need to watch the PR too to get the notification for cases > that I'm interested in both the Jira discussion and PR comments. But that > won't be a big problem for me. > > Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org> 于2023年4月19日周三 18:43写道： > >> +1 from me as well >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, 04:19 Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Everything that happens in a GitHub PR creates a worklog entry under >>> the respective JIRA ticket. >>> For every worklog entry we receive a notification from j...@apache.org >>> when we are watching an issue. The worklog entry and email >>> notification usually appear messy. >>> >>> Moreover, if we are watching the GitHub PR we are going to get a >>> notification from notificati...@github.com which has the same content >>> with the JIRA worklog entry and is much more readable. >>> >>> Finally, the PR notification is also going to >>> comm...@calcite.apache.org so those who are subscribed to that list >>> will get the same notification three times. >>> >>> Personally, I never read the JIRA worklog notifications and I largely >>> prefer those from notificati...@github.com. >>> >>> How do you feel about disabling the worklog entries in JIRA coming >>> from GitHub PRs? >>> >>> For archiving purposes, the notifications already go to commits@ so we >>> don't lose anything from disabling the worklog entries. On the >>> contrary, I find that this would reduce the noise and redundancy on >>> our inboxes. >>> >>> Concretely this is what I have in mind in terms of change: >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3166 >>> >>> Best, >>> Stamatis >>> >> > > > -- > > Best, > Benchao Li
