+1, thanks Stamatis for preparing it!

Julian Hyde <[email protected]> 于2023年10月3日周二 23:25写道:
>
> +1, and thanks.
>
> FYI I’m speaking at Community over Code on 10/9, “Building a semantic/metrics 
> layer using Calcite”.  I believe Mihai is giving a talk “Streaming 
> Incremental View Maintenance with Apache Calcite”. Your call whether to 
> include these in this report or the next one.
>
> Julian
>
> > On Oct 2, 2023, at 6:45 AM, Alessandro Solimando 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1, thanks Stamatis for putting this together!
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 11:27, LakeShen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1, Nice work, Stamatis!
> >>
> >> Ruben Q L <[email protected]> 于2023年10月2日周一 16:58写道:
> >>
> >>> +1, thanks Stamatis!
> >>>
> >>> @Sergey thanks for the info! IMO your talk would be a nice addition for
> >> the
> >>> next report (Q4).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:48 AM Francis Chuang <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1, Excellent work, Stamatis!
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/10/2023 6:58 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Below you can find a draft of this quarter's board report. I plan to
> >>>>> submit the final version next Monday (October 9, 2023).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please let me know if you have any additions or corrections.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Stamatis
> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ## Description:
> >>>>> Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and
> >>>> planning
> >>>>> queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows database-like
> >>>>> access,
> >>>>> and in particular a SQL interface and advanced query optimization,
> >> for
> >>>> data
> >>>>> not residing in a traditional database.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Avatica is a sub-project within Calcite and provides a framework for
> >>>>> building
> >>>>> local and remote JDBC and ODBC database drivers. Avatica has an
> >>>> independent
> >>>>> release schedule and its own repository.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ## Project Status:
> >>>>> Current project status: ongoing
> >>>>> Issues for the board: none
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ## Membership Data:
> >>>>> Apache Calcite was founded 2015-10-22 (8 years ago)
> >>>>> There are currently 69 committers and 27 PMC members in this project.
> >>>>> The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 2:1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Community changes, past quarter:
> >>>>> - No new PMC members. Last addition was Benchao Li on 2023-01-27.
> >>>>> - TJ Banghart was added as committer on 2023-07-04
> >>>>> - Dan Zou was added as committer on 2023-07-04
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ## Project Activity:
> >>>>> Apache Calcite 1.35.0 was released on 2023-07-26. It contains
> >>>> contributions
> >>>>> from 36 contributors, and resolves 140 issues. The new release has
> >> many
> >>>>> improvements in the BigQuery and Spark dialect bringing in more than
> >> 40
> >>>> SQL
> >>>>> functions. Additionally, it comes with new optimizations for reducing
> >>>> the size
> >>>>> of generated code and more powerful expression simplifications.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On August 18, 2023, Benchao Li and Jiajun Xie represented the Calcite
> >>>>> community at the Apache Con East Asia by giving talks related with
> >> the
> >>>>> project.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ## Community Health:
> >>>>> The project is healthy. Previously, it was super healthy. The drop is
> >>>> likely
> >>>>> to the fact that the PMC has not grown in the last six months but
> >> this
> >>>> will
> >>>>> very likely change in the near future since a lot of our current
> >>>> committers
> >>>>> are very involved with the project and hopefully they will join the
> >> PMC
> >>>>> shortly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The dev list had a 38% in activity in the past quarter, with busiest
> >>>> threads
> >>>>> been as usual those around releases and introduction of new
> >> committers.
> >>>> The
> >>>>> 16% increase in activity of the JIRA also contributes to the general
> >>>> increase
> >>>>> in traffic of the dev list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The number of non-committer (contributor) commits per month:
> >>>>> +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> >>>>> |        year         |        month        | contributor_commits |
> >>>>> +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> >>>>> | 2023                | 7                   | 16                  |
> >>>>> | 2023                | 8                   | 32                  |
> >>>>> | 2023                | 9                   | 32                  |
> >>>>> +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The number of active reviewers per month:
> >>>>> +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> >>>>> |        year         |        month        |  active_reviewers   |
> >>>>> +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> >>>>> | 2023                | 7                   | 9                   |
> >>>>> | 2023                | 8                   | 9                   |
> >>>>> | 2023                | 9                   | 10                  |
> >>>>> +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Top-3 reviewers in the last quarter:
> >>>>> +-----------+---------------------+
> >>>>> | committer |       reviews       |
> >>>>> +-----------+---------------------+
> >>>>> | Jiajun <[email protected]> | 15                  |
> >>>>> | Julian Hyde <[email protected]> | 13                  |
> >>>>> | Benchao Li <[email protected]> | 11                  |
> >>>>> +-----------+---------------------+
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The number of non-committer commits has increased by 9% from the last
> >>>> quarter
> >>>>> (73 commits in Q2 vs. 80 commits in Q3) keeping up the good momentum
> >> of
> >>>> having
> >>>>> new people contributing to the project.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The average number of active reviewers per month has increased
> >> slightly
> >>>> from
> >>>>> the last quarter (7.6 in Q2 vs. 9.3 in Q3) showing that more people
> >> are
> >>>>> participating in the review process which is among the main points of
> >>> the
> >>>>> project.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In the top reviewers, we can observe that things are a bit more
> >>> balanced
> >>>> in
> >>>>> Q3. The review count per person in the top-3 tier is lower than usual
> >>>> but in
> >>>>> conjunction with the increase in the number of non-committer commits
> >>>>> it shows that
> >>>>> reviews are more evenly distributed among the members of the
> >> community.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>


-- 

Best,
Benchao Li

Reply via email to