The version of Guava we compile against is relevant. In 1.35 we
compiled against Guava 19.0; in 1.36 we compiled against Guava
32.1.3-jre. The effect would be the same if we compiled against any
version of Guava 20.0 or higher, due to the addition of
Preconditions.checkArgument methods that in earlier Guava versions
would be handled by varargs method.

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5477 (which was
fixed in 1.35) and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5763
(which was fixed in 1.36 and essentially reverted 5477).

Julian

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:20 AM Guillaume Masse
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Benchao Li,
>
> thanks for giving me more details like the java version,
>
> I compiled with 1.8.0_371-b11 on macos x64 (emulated) and I was still able
> to transform the classfile. The bug must come from something else. Was this
> compiled on your personal machine? Was it on windows/linux/mac? What's the
> processor architecture?
>
> 1.35.0 also pases the transformation and the same piece of code is there.
> How was 1.35.0 released?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 9:59 PM Benchao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Guillaume,
> >
> > The binary release are always compiled with JDK8, this is a required
> > procedure[1].
> >
> > For 1.36.0, the JDK version I'm using is:
> > $ java -version
> > java version "1.8.0_371"
> > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_371-b11)
> > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.371-b11, mixed mode)
> >
> > [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/howto.html#making-a-release-candidate
> >
> > Guillaume Masse <[email protected]> 于2023年11月24日周五
> > 07:22写道:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We recently upgraded to calcite 1.36.0 and it broke our deployment
> > process.
> > > We are using java asm  <https://asm.ow2.io/> to shade (rename packages
> > from
> > > the bytecode) since there are multiple dependencies clash when using with
> > > Apache Spark. For example, Apache Spark is using a much older version of
> > > guava. If I build calcite locally with Java Correto 17.0.7-amzn I can
> > > transform calcite's bytecode without any problem. Where can I find the
> > java
> > > version used to compiled calcite? Is there a process in place to have a
> > > consistent java version?
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.ow2.org/asm/asm/-/issues/318008
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Guillaume Massé
> > > [Gee-OHM]
> > > (马赛卫)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best,
> > Benchao Li
> >

Reply via email to