I see the red circles in the svg query plan I added to the gist. I’m just not sure what it’s supposed to be telling me.
Thank you! Eric On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:35 Eric Berryman <eric.berry...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1.37.0 > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:28 Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Which Calcite version are you using? >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:22 PM Eric Berryman <eric.berry...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I’ve noticed if I remove the limit, the EnumerableUnion works fine. So >> it >> > seems the infinite cost is coming from the EnumerableLimit outside of >> the >> > union. I have an LDAPSortLimit which is pushed past the union, and an >> > EnumerableLimit >> > is left outside the union, as you can see in the gist. >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:10 Eric Berryman <eric.berry...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Is there anymore information that would be helpful for me to give to >> aide >> > > in troubleshooting this? >> > > >> > > Thank you! >> > > Eric >> > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 16:51 Eric Berryman <eric.berry...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> >> > >> I seem to be struggling with unions still. Here is a gist with the >> > output >> > >> and svg of the plan. >> > >> >> > >> https://gist.github.com/berryma4/c4870dd4e292e0509d1c85c308b52e67 >> > >> >> > >> I need a little help on direction of what the svg is telling me. I >> see >> > >> the cost is infinite, but I don’t see where I’m missing a rule. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Thank you for your help, >> > >> Eric >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 18:28 Eric Berryman <eric.berry...@gmail.com >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> That didn't paste well. Here is a gist: >> > >>> https://gist.github.com/berryma4/c6c09da050f273295edd23c045c63403 >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 4:58 PM Eric Berryman < >> eric.berry...@gmail.com >> > > >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> I’m back from a long holiday, and seem stuck still on this >> scenario. >> > >>>> The plan gets created without any issues, but I get this error >> while >> > >>>> executing queries with unions. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thank you again! >> > >>>> Eric >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Here is the plan dump and error after running >> > >>>> relRunner.prepareStatement. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> EnumerableProject(UserObject=[$0], id=[$3]): rowcount = 30.0, >> > >>>> cumulative cost = {146.0 rows, 1393.2 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 213 >> > >>>> EnumerableLimit(fetch=[100]): rowcount = 30.0, cumulative cost = >> > {116.0 >> > >>>> rows, 1333.2 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 212 EnumerableUnion(all=[true]): >> > rowcount = >> > >>>> 30.0, cumulative cost = {86.0 rows, 1303.2 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 211 >> > >>>> EnumerableProject(UserObject=[$0], id=[$3]): rowcount = 15.0, >> > cumulative >> > >>>> cost = {28.0 rows, 636.6 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 207 >> > LDAPToEnumerableConverter: >> > >>>> rowcount = 15.0, cumulative cost = {13.0 rows, 21.6 cpu, 0.0 io}, >> id >> > = 206 >> > >>>> LDAPFilter(condition=[=(UPPER($5), 'RUDD')]): rowcount = 15.0, >> > cumulative >> > >>>> cost = {11.5 rows, 20.1 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 205 >> > >>>> LDAPTableScan(table=[[SCIMUserSchema, cap_internet_ddpmildap]]): >> > rowcount = >> > >>>> 100.0, cumulative cost = {10.0 rows, 10.100000000000001 cpu, 0.0 >> io}, >> > id = >> > >>>> 0 EnumerableProject(UserObject=[$0], id=[$3]): rowcount = 15.0, >> > cumulative >> > >>>> cost = {28.0 rows, 636.6 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 210 >> > LDAPToEnumerableConverter: >> > >>>> rowcount = 15.0, cumulative cost = {13.0 rows, 21.6 cpu, 0.0 io}, >> id >> > = 209 >> > >>>> LDAPFilter(condition=[=(UPPER($5), 'RUDD')]): rowcount = 15.0, >> > cumulative >> > >>>> cost = {11.5 rows, 20.1 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 208 >> > >>>> LDAPTableScan(table=[[SCIMUserSchema, prov_internet_ddpmildap]]): >> > rowcount >> > >>>> = 100.0, cumulative cost = {10.0 rows, 10.100000000000001 cpu, 0.0 >> > io}, id >> > >>>> = 2 >> > >>>> >> > >>>> java.lang.AssertionError: null at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.adapter.enumerable.EnumerableLimit.<init>(EnumerableLimit.java:60) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.adapter.enumerable.EnumerableLimit.copy(EnumerableLimit.java:84) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.adapter.enumerable.EnumerableLimit.copy(EnumerableLimit.java:43) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.sql2rel.RelFieldTrimmer.trimFields(RelFieldTrimmer.java:378) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103) >> > >>>> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580) at >> > >>>> org.apache.calcite.util.ReflectUtil$2.invoke(ReflectUtil.java:533) >> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.sql2rel.RelFieldTrimmer.dispatchTrimFields(RelFieldTrimmer.java:286) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.sql2rel.RelFieldTrimmer.trimChild(RelFieldTrimmer.java:228) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.sql2rel.RelFieldTrimmer.trimFields(RelFieldTrimmer.java:514) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103) >> > >>>> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580) at >> > >>>> org.apache.calcite.util.ReflectUtil$2.invoke(ReflectUtil.java:533) >> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.sql2rel.RelFieldTrimmer.dispatchTrimFields(RelFieldTrimmer.java:286) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.sql2rel.RelFieldTrimmer.trim(RelFieldTrimmer.java:173) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.sql2rel.SqlToRelConverter.trimUnusedFields(SqlToRelConverter.java:567) >> > >>>> at >> > org.apache.calcite.prepare.Prepare.trimUnusedFields(Prepare.java:386) at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl$CalcitePreparingStmt.prepare_(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:1061) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl$CalcitePreparingStmt.prepareRel(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:1026) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl.prepare2_(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:687) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl.prepare_(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:519) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.prepare.CalcitePrepareImpl.prepareSql(CalcitePrepareImpl.java:487) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.jdbc.CalciteConnectionImpl.parseQuery(CalciteConnectionImpl.java:237) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.jdbc.CalciteConnectionImpl.prepareStatement_(CalciteConnectionImpl.java:217) >> > >>>> at >> > >>>> >> > >> org.apache.calcite.jdbc.CalciteConnectionImpl.lambda$unwrap$0(CalciteConnectionImpl.java:187) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:07 Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Eric, if you want to use EnumerableUnion instead of implementing >> your >> > >>>>> own >> > >>>>> Union, then I think you'll need to implement the appropriate >> > Converter >> > >>>>> [1] >> > >>>>> to transform between conventions LDAP <=> ENUMERABLE >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Best, >> > >>>>> Ruben >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> [1] >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/main/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/convert/Converter.java >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:56 PM Eric Berryman < >> > eric.berry...@gmail.com >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > I implement an LDAPUnion and rule to convert from logicalunion, >> and >> > >>>>> of >> > >>>>> > course, the error goes away. But I didn’t implement the union >> > >>>>> correctly, so >> > >>>>> > nothing is returned in my query. Is there a way to have my >> > LDAPUnion >> > >>>>> > use EnumerableUnion, >> > >>>>> > or a way to not have LDAPUnion and take care of this with a >> rule? >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > Thank you again! >> > >>>>> > Eric >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 14:24 Eric Berryman < >> > eric.berry...@gmail.com >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > wrote: >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > > Well, I was wrong. That didn’t solve my problem with : >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > Missing conversion is LogicalUnion[convention: NONE -> LDAP] >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > Do I have to implement my own union? Is there a way I could >> just >> > >>>>> use the >> > >>>>> > > EnumerableUnion? >> > >>>>> > > ie. NONE -> Enumerable and skip implementing one for my ldap >> > >>>>> datastore? >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > Thank you! >> > >>>>> > > Eric >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 09:00 Eric Berryman < >> > >>>>> eric.berry...@gmail.com> >> > >>>>> > > wrote: >> > >>>>> > > >> > >>>>> > >> When I register my tablescan object, and add my rules, I also >> > >>>>> added a >> > >>>>> > >> removeRule for EnumerableRules.ENUMERABLE_MERGE_UNION_RULE, >> and >> > >>>>> now >> > >>>>> > >> everything works with an offset also. >> > >>>>> > >> >> > >>>>> > >> Although, I don’t know why this is. I noticed the >> > >>>>> EnumerableMergeUnion >> > >>>>> > >> object in the plan, and thought I would try to remove it, >> > because >> > >>>>> it was >> > >>>>> > >> different. >> > >>>>> > >> >> > >>>>> > >> Any explanation is appreciated, thank you!!! >> > >>>>> > >> Eric >> > >>>>> > >> >> > >>>>> > >> >> > >>>>> > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 18:02 Eric Berryman < >> > >>>>> eric.berry...@gmail.com> >> > >>>>> > >> wrote: >> > >>>>> > >> >> > >>>>> > >>> Hello! >> > >>>>> > >>> >> > >>>>> > >>> I seem to have an issue with my new limit rule which pushes >> > down >> > >>>>> to the >> > >>>>> > >>> datastore. It works fine, unless I add an offset to the >> fetch. >> > >>>>> Where I >> > >>>>> > end >> > >>>>> > >>> up with the following error: >> > >>>>> > >>> There are not enough rules… Missing conversion is >> > >>>>> > >>> LogicalUnion[convention: NONE -> LDAP] >> > >>>>> > >>> >> > >>>>> > >>> Why would this only come up when an offset value is added? >> > >>>>> > >>> >> > >>>>> > >>> Thank you! >> > >>>>> > >>> Eric >> > >>>>> > >>> >> > >>>>> > >>> >> > >>>>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 09:25 Eric Berryman < >> > >>>>> eric.berry...@gmail.com> >> > >>>>> > >>> wrote: >> > >>>>> > >>> >> > >>>>> > >>>> That’s perfect >> > >>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/main/cassandra/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/adapter/cassandra/CassandraRules.java#L401 >> > >>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>> Thank you for such a quick response! >> > >>>>> > >>>> Eric >> > >>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 09:14 Michael Mior < >> mm...@apache.org> >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> Eric, >> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> Could you give a more specific example of the failure >> > scenario >> > >>>>> you're >> > >>>>> > >>>>> experiencing? >> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> For a simple example of how limits can be pushed down, >> this >> > is >> > >>>>> done >> > >>>>> > in >> > >>>>> > >>>>> the >> > >>>>> > >>>>> Cassandra adapter with CassandraLimitRule. It matches an >> > >>>>> > >>>>> EnumerableLimit on >> > >>>>> > >>>>> top of a CassandraToEnumerableConverter and then converts >> > that >> > >>>>> limit >> > >>>>> > >>>>> to a >> > >>>>> > >>>>> CassandraLimit which passes along the limit and offset >> > >>>>> information to >> > >>>>> > >>>>> CassandraToEnumerableConverter for when the query is >> > executed. >> > >>>>> The >> > >>>>> > >>>>> EnumerableLimit is then replaced with a CassandraLimit >> > >>>>> effectively >> > >>>>> > as a >> > >>>>> > >>>>> placeholder to signal that the limit has been handled. >> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- >> > >>>>> > >>>>> Michael Mior >> > >>>>> > >>>>> mm...@apache.org >> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:44 AM Eric Berryman < >> > >>>>> > eric.berry...@gmail.com >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Hello! >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > When I add limit to my relbuilder object, the planner >> gives >> > >>>>> up. But >> > >>>>> > >>>>> works >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > fine without it. >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > I wasn’t able to find any examples of using limit and >> > >>>>> pushing the >> > >>>>> > >>>>> limit >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > values down to a data source. >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Could someone help with some links on this subject? >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thank you! >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Eric >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>> >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >> >
