Looks good, thanks for putting this together Ruben!
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 10:02 PM Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1, great work, Ruben! > > On 31/12/2024 11:48 pm, Zhe Hu wrote: > > +1, looks pretty neat! > > Really appreciate the effort, Ruben. > > > > > > Best regards, > > ZheHu > > > > > > > > > > ---- Replied Message ---- > > | From | Ruben Q L<rube...@gmail.com> | > > | Date | 12/31/2024 15:39 | > > | To | Apache Calcite dev list<dev@calcite.apache.org> | > > | Subject | Draft: board report for 2024 Q4 | > > Hello, > > > > Below you can find a draft of this quarter's board report. I plan to submit > > the final version at the beginning of next week. > > Please let me know if you have any additions or corrections. > > > > Best, > > Ruben > > > > > > ----------------------------------- > > > > ## Description: > > Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and planning > > queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows database-like > > access, > > and in particular a SQL interface and advanced query optimization, for data > > not residing in a traditional database. > > > > Avatica is a sub-project within Calcite and provides a framework for > > building > > local and remote JDBC and ODBC database drivers. Avatica has an independent > > release schedule and its own repository. > > > > ## Project Status: > > Current project status: ongoing (high activity) > > Issues for the board: none > > > > ## Membership Data: > > Apache Calcite was founded 2015-10-22 (9 years ago) > > There are currently 75 committers and 29 PMC members in this project. > > The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 5:2. > > > > Community changes, past quarter: > > - No new PMC members. Last addition was Mihai Budiu on 2024-07-26. > > - No new committers. Last addition was Norman Jordan on 2024-08-13. > > > > ## Project Activity: > > Apache Calcite 1.38.0 was released on 2024-10-15. It contained contributions > > from 39 contributors, and resolved 165 issues. The main features of this > > release were the AS MEASURE clause to define measures and use them in simple > > queries, ASOF join, the EXCLUDE clause in window aggregates, > > Postgres-compatible implementations of the TO_DATE, TO_TIMESTAMP and TO_CHAR > > functions, and the extension of the type system to allow types with negative > > scale. > > > > There was no release for Apache Avatica in the last quarter, but discussions > > have started to release the next version (1.26.0) soon. > > > > Following our traditional yearly rotation, a new PMC Chair (Ruben Quesada > > Lopez) was chosen for 2025. > > > > ## Community Health: > > The community continues on a "Super healthy" status. Looking at the metrics, > > we have seen an increase on the commit activity (10% increase on commits, > > 42% > > increase on code contributors). Other metrics show a slight decrease, e.g. > > 9% > > decrease in traffic on the dev meailing list, or 16% / 10% decrease on > > opened > > / closed PRs, which is understandable considering the holiday period at the > > end of the year. > > > > The number of non-committer (contributor) commits per month: > > +------+-------+---------------------+ > > | year | month | contributor_commits | > > +------+-------+---------------------+ > > | 2024 | 10 | 16 | > > | 2024 | 11 | 19 | > > | 2024 | 12 | 19 | > > +------+-------+---------------------+ > > > > The number of active reviewers per month: > > +------+-------+------------------+ > > | year | month | active_reviewers | > > +------+-------+------------------+ > > | 2024 | 10 | 3 | > > | 2024 | 11 | 2 | > > | 2024 | 12 | 5 | > > +------+-------+------------------+ > > > > Top reviewers in the last 3 months: > > +-------------+---------+ > > | committer | reviews | > > +-------------+---------+ > > | Mihai Budiu | 39 | > > | ILuffZhe | 5 | > > | NobiGo | 4 | > > +-------------+---------+ > > > > We have seen a decrease in the number of reviewers compared to previous > > quarters, with one particular reviewer (Mihai Budiu) being the most active > > one > > and taking care of most of this job. The situation with PR reviewing and the > > lack of reviewers, especially in a non-release period (usually right before > > a > > release more reviewers tend to get involved), is a known issue within the > > community, which has been discussed several times on the mailing list with > > several proposals to try to mitigate it. >
