Hi all,


I have completed the forced fix and temporarily kept a backup-ea985df branch 
(which is identical to the previous main branch). The CI now passes 
successfully. If there are no other issues, I will delete this temporary branch 
in a few weeks. Special thanks to Stamatis and Michael for their prompt 
responses and help.

I apologize again for the inconvenience. 




Best,

Zhen Chen












At 2025-09-06 20:28:18, "我" <czjour...@163.com> wrote:
>Thank you very much Michael, I will use the method you told me to correct the 
>latest erroneous merge.
>
>
>---- Replied Message ----
>| From | Michael Mior<mm...@apache.org> |
>| Date | 09/06/2025 20:18 |
>| To | dev@calcite.apache.org |
>| Cc | |
>| Subject | Re: Apply for revert PR |
>Zhen,
>
>We've generally considered a force push shortly after a commit is made to
>fix an issue acceptable. (To be extra safe, use --force-push-with-lease
>which will reject the force push if anyone else has pushed since your last
>update.)
>
>--
>Michael Mior
>mm...@apache.org
>
>
>On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 8:13 AM 我 <czjour...@163.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm very sorry that I didn't check the commit information carefully in
>> PR[1], which resulted in multiple inconsistent commits being merged in. I
>> wanted to try reverting, but I'm worried about polluting the commit
>> message. So, I'd like to squash the commits as the original PR author and
>> force-push a new commit to the main branch. Could you please help me figure
>> out if this solution is feasible? If so, I'll proceed.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4501
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Zhen Chen

Reply via email to