Hi Calcite Community,
Since Calcite has been around for a long time, many JIRAs have actually been fixed but not closed [1]. Now, I'd like to discuss how we should handle these JIRAs. For example, should we submit an additional PR to provide test cases to prove that the JIRA has been fixed? Should we find a commit that directly or indirectly fixes the issue as additional information (this may not be mandatory)? If we need a PR, do we need some minor specifications? For example, should we still maintain strict consistency between the PR title/commit message/jira title? Should we include the commit that fixes the issue (if found) in the PR and explain that this is just adding test cases? So, I'd like to ask how we can better handle these types of JIRAs. Best regards, Zhen Chen [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4763
