I am very skeptical that Wordfully uses Calcite. I think they are exploiting us (and Camel, Nifi, Clickhouse, Druid, Pinot, HBase, Hudi and a couple dozen other projects) for SEO. One person [1] has opened 15 PRs.
I can’t imagine why a company would use both Druid and Pinot. Julian [1] https://github.com/vlbaluk > On Nov 9, 2026, at 8:25 AM, Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry about this, I should have been more careful. > > Mihai > ________________________________ > From: Ruben Q L <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, November 9, 2026 1:03 AM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: CI failures caused by commit message validation on main > > Hi, > > It seems the merge of PR#5398 [1] (which was merged without squashing) > broke the LintTest [2]. > Typically for this type of commit we use the "Site: ..." prefix, e.g. [3] > > How should we address this? Shall we go for an exceptional force-push right > away? > > Best, > Ruben > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/5398 > [2] > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Calcite/job/Calcite-snapshots/2219/testReport/junit/org.apache.calcite.test/LintTest/testLintLog__/ > [3] > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/9e8177360b983aabe9cd8bdfe3edc165451ddbb8 > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2026 at 8:39 AM Vladislav Pyatkov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> PR check filed due to two commits: >> >> - docs: describe Wordfully's Calcite use >> - docs: add Wordfully to powered-by page >> >> Both trigger “Message must start with upper-case letter”. >> >> -- >> Vladislav Pyatkov >>
