Jinfeng is in the process of getting Drill back onto the master of
Calcite.  He is working on this actively right now.  (We'd fallen a bit
behind.)  I imagine there would be a smattering of fixes that will come out
of this work and I'd love to get these incorporated.  I'd love to have a
couple more weeks to get those in and start a 1.0 vote early February.
Anything in particular that would make targeting a few weeks later an
issue?

thx,
Jacques

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:

> I do consider SQL changes to be API changes. These particular changes are
> backward compatible (no previous valid SQL would be broken by these
> changes) and therefore they could be introduced in a point release (say
> 1.1).
>
> Julian
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2015, at 1:49 PM, James Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Would CALCITE-505 or CALCITE-495 be considered API changes? These
> would be good to get in sooner rather than later IMO.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I  think we are close to being able to release Calcite 1.0.
>
> Release 1.0 is always a "big deal”, but I don’t want to make a huge deal
> out of it. In the semantic versioning methodology [ http://semver.org/ ],
> there is an understanding that after 1.0, APIs only change in significant
> ways in major versions. Accordingly, we aimed to complete the
> re-organization of code into the org.apache.calcite namespace before 1.0.
>
> But let’s not wait until the product is “done” before we release 1.0. (A
> software project is never “done”.) I’d like to keep up our
> about-once-a-month release tempo.
>
> I have served as Release Manager [
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ReleaseManager ] on
> previous
> releases, but one of the things we need to achieve before we graduate from
> the Incubator is to spread the tasks among committers. Would someone else
> like to volunteer to be release manager?
>
> What issues must be fixed before 1.0? I only have two:
>
>
>   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-466
>   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-558
>
>
> Any others?
>
> What timeline for the release? How about if we create the first release
> candidate a week from today Tue 1/20? (It may take a few release
> candidates, then a 3 day vote, then a 3 day IPMC vote.)
>
> Please chime in on the release timescale, critical issues, and offers to
> help.
>
> Julian
>

Reply via email to