I tried few of the failing tests with the RC & they seems to be still
failing.
I looked in to one of them "subquery_in_having.q".

See the exception stack below:
java.lang.Exception
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.TypeCheckCtx.setError(TypeCheckCtx.java:152)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.TypeCheckProcFactory$DefaultExprProcessor.processQualifiedColRef(TypeCheckProcFactory.java:1001)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.TypeCheckProcFactory$DefaultExprProcessor.process(TypeCheckProcFactory.java:1109)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.QBSubQuery$ConjunctAnalyzer.resolveDot(QBSubQuery.java:331)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.QBSubQuery$ConjunctAnalyzer.analyzeExpr(QBSubQuery.java:273)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.QBSubQuery$ConjunctAnalyzer.analyzeExpr(QBSubQuery.java:285)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.QBSubQuery$ConjunctAnalyzer.analyzeConjunct(QBSubQuery.java:315)
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.QBSubQuery.rewrite(QBSubQuery.java:785)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.QBSubQuery.validateAndRewriteAST(QBSubQuery.java:587)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.CalcitePlanner$CalcitePlannerAction.genFilterRelNode(CalcitePlanner.java:1366)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.CalcitePlanner$CalcitePlannerAction.genGBHavingLogicalPlan(CalcitePlanner.java:2662)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.CalcitePlanner$CalcitePlannerAction.genLogicalPlan(CalcitePlanner.java:2573)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.CalcitePlanner$CalcitePlannerAction.apply(CalcitePlanner.java:693)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.CalcitePlanner$CalcitePlannerAction.apply(CalcitePlanner.java:660)
at org.apache.calcite.tools.Frameworks$1.apply(Frameworks.java:109)


On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:

> Most if not all of those failures are either cosmetic or are plan
> improvements.
>
> Can you provide specifics?
>
> Julian
>
> > On Jan 25, 2015, at 07:59, John Pullokkaran <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I am seeing around 60 failures for Hive with the RC candidate.
> > In addition to CALCITE-566, there seems to be other issues.
> >
> > -1 non binding.
> >
> > Thanks
> > John
> >
> >
> >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> 24 hours left to vote for 1.0 RC1. Please download the release, kick
> >> the tires, and vote! (Only PPMC votes are binding, but other votes
> >> help us get to a high-quality release.)
> >>
> >> Julian
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to