Okay, thanks! Quick JIRA tip, I've seen other projects use the "component" field to great affect. It's not a free-form field like label, so it's value is more reliable.
-n On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. I’ve tagged these issues “avatica”. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%20avatica > > On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:20 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think we'll also need to get 626, 636, 637, 639, 640, 641, and 642 in > > order to have Avatica ready for basic prod deployments. > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I'm not sure about the other portions of Phoenix. For my efforts on > >>> PHOENIX-971, I'd like to see these Avatica improvements make it in. > >> > >> If by “these improvements” you mean the list in my original email, these > >> have already been committed to Apache master. So, they’ll definitely be > in > >> Calcite 1.2. This includes Avatica issues 618, 638, 630, 627. > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> > >
