My preferences in order would be Groovy Scala Ruby
Its kinda hard to really grok which is most popular out of those three but we've already got a DSL in Groovy and Scala (though Scala is currently the most expressive and feature complete really). Ruby's DSL needs the most work to catch up to Scala's 2009/4/8 Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>: > +1 for starting with Groovy. > Here are some links[1][2] which show some examples about using the > Groovy with Camel. > > [1]http://gforge.openehealth.org/gf/project/ipf/ > [2]http://mrhaki.blogspot.com/2009/04/use-apache-camel-plugin-in-grails.html > > Willem > > Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I think we should start with Groovy, Python and Ruby. It's hard to >> decide on priorities, every time I try to, I feel like changing the >> order. If you have a preference please let us know. After we get the >> AST it should be all the same. >> >> Btw, one of the first things we need to do is decide which of the 2 >> projects is of more interest to you so we would know how to rank it. >> >> You can find me (and others) online on the #camel channel at >> irc.codehaus.org if you'd like to chat about it. >> >> Cheers >> Hadrian >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:55 AM, 宓学强 wrote: >> >>> I wonder which dynamic language should we add for the Dynamic route >>> support,Groovy,Ruby,Python or Scala? >>> Hope every one can give the opinion and we can negotiate to decide that. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> 宓学强 allo...@gmail.com >> >> > > -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
