[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=51553#action_51553
]
Christopher Hunt commented on CAMEL-1570:
-----------------------------------------
Hi Claus,
1.x patches attached. I have not addressed 2.0. With regards to:
_In Camel 2.0 however I was wondering if we should endorse the # notation
lookup that is used in the URI to refer to a bean in the registry with this id._
I think so.
_And if we just added the type on the endpoint as: List<Handler> handlers with
getter/setter then we can improve the DefaultComponent to support lists for its
automatic # lookup._
Do you mean List<String> not List<Handler>? Or do you think that the
DefaultComponent could resolve the type from the bean's name?
_Today it only supports a single # property. If so we get a general solution.
So I would like that we took the time to look into this in Camel 2.0._
How would a list be expressed in the URI? The same way as for 1.x i.e. using a
comma?
_See method setReferenceProperties in DefaultComponent in Camel 2.0._
I'm going to need your help on this one I think.
> Jetty component is unable to be configured for security
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1570
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1570
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-jetty
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1
> Environment: NA
> Reporter: Christopher Hunt
> Attachments: jetty-handlers-test.txt, jetty-handlers.txt
>
>
> The Jetty component is presently unable to be configured for security. A
> general purpose mechanism so that the Jetty component can be configured would
> be useful. The following URI based option is proposed:
> ||Name||Default Value||Description||
> |handlers|null| Specifies a comma delimited set of instances in your Registry
> (such as your Spring ApplicationContext). These instances are added to the
> Jetty servlet context|
> Here is an example URI:
> {code}
> jetty:http://0.0.0.0:9080/MyService?handlers=securityHandler
> {code}
> This could refer to something like the following Spring configuration:
> {code}
> <!-- Jetty Security handling -->
> <bean id="userRealm" class="org.mortbay.jetty.plus.jaas.JAASUserRealm">
> <property name="name" value="tracker-users" />
> <property name="loginModuleName" value="ldaploginmodule" />
> </bean>
> <bean id="constraint" class="org.mortbay.jetty.security.Constraint">
> <property name="name" value="BASIC" />
> <property name="roles" value="tracker-users" />
> <property name="authenticate" value="true" />
> </bean>
> <bean id="constraintMapping"
> class="org.mortbay.jetty.security.ConstraintMapping">
> <property name="constraint" ref="constraint" />
> <property name="pathSpec" value="/*" />
> </bean>
> <bean id="securityHandler"
> class="org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler">
> <property name="userRealm" ref="userRealm" />
> <property name="constraintMappings" ref="constraintMapping" />
> </bean>
> {code}
> I have attached proposed changes to the 1.6 branch. I imagine that 2.0 should
> be quite similar.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
