[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=51633#action_51633
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-1606:
------------------------------------
Okay gotta it sorted. The other definitions that uses blocks handle the
push/block/end by hand - for instance TryDefintion.
I guess this makes sense allowing your definition to be in full control how
block should be applied.
Got it working now with synchronize
> Java RouteBuilder with blocks seems to not work correctly with end()
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1606
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Working on the new DSL for onComplete, onFailure callbacks for Exchange when
> its done.
> The route below is to define a subroute (the block with sycnhronize).
> {code}
> from("direct:start")
> .synchronize()
> .to("mock:before")
> .process(complete)
> .to("mock:after")
> .end()
> .transform(constant("Bye World"))
> .to("mock:result");
> {code}
> So the otuer route should be:
> from -> sync -> transform -> mock:result
> and sync sub route should be:
> sync -> mock:before -> process -> mock:after
> But with the current codebase the end() is not handling the block correctly.
> It ends with the outer route being incl. the sub route:
> from -> sync -> mock:before -> process -> mock:after -> transform ->
> mock:result
> Spring DSL does not have this issue as it uses XML tags to indicate sub
> routes and where they start/end
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
