Hi Claus,

I think we should keep the camel-spring-javaconfig.
We *have* the document[1] and example[2] for it.
With the camel-spring-javaconfig, we could write the rule with DSL
without touching any XML configuration, specially the <package> tag.

<camelContext xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";>
    <package>org.apache.camel.spring.config.scan.route</package>
</camelContext>

[1]http://camel.apache.org/spring-java-config.html
[2]http://camel.apache.org/spring-java-config-example.html

Willem

Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
> 
> In Camel 2.0 we have several components that are not used, abandoned
> and/or in a questionable quality. We have touched this issue before
> and kinda agreed to move them to a sandbox area in SVN. Maybe using a
> different name.
> 
> I have compiled a list for suggested components to be moved:
> =================
> 
> camel-activemq-web
> - not documented
> - not used
> - Kinda experiment code from James
> 
> 
> camel-jhc
> - lack quality in codebase
> - has not been active maintained for a long time
> - not documented
> - not used
> - and its a constant pain to keep updated when we do cross component
> refactorings
> 
> 
> camel-jmxconnect
> - lack quality in codebase
> - has not been active maintained for a long time
> - not documented
> - not used
> 
> 
> camel-spring-javaconfig
> - depends on Spring JavaConfig SNAPSHOT
> - Spring JavaConfig is kinda @deprecated as its moved to be part of
> Spring 3.0 core
> - not documented
> - not used
> - Kinda experiment code from James
> - remove the camel-example-spring-javaconfig also
> 
> 
> camel-supercsv
> - has not been active maintained for a long time
> - not documented
> - not used
> - and we have 2-3 other CSV components (flatpack, csv, bindy)
> 
> 
> camel-swing
> - has not been active maintained for a long time
> - not documented
> - not used
> - confusing concept what you can integrate with Swing.
> - (Kinda experiment code from James)
> 
> 
> camel-uface
> - has not been active maintained for a long time
> - not documented
> - not used
> - confusing concept what you can integrate with Swing / UFace.
> - Kinda experiment code from James
> 
> 
> And the next two is more up for debate
> ===================
> 
> camel-testng
> - has not been active maintained for a long time
> - not documented
> - not used
> - testng is loosing the battle against JUnit 4.x
> 
> 
> camel-hamcrest
> - has not been active maintained for a long time
> - not documented
> - not used
> - we do not used it internally for unit testing either
> 
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> 

Reply via email to