Hi,
When files are generated using the Camel archetypes, the code contains
the usual license note we have in the Camel files:
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed
with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License,
Version 2.0
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
I am not sure if the *generated* files should contain the statement
that the code:
* is "Licensed to the [...] ASF"
* "under one or more" CLAs (people who ran the maven archetype most
likely don't have a CLA on file
* "The ASF licenses this file to You"
Obviously the user would be responsible for his code, so he'd have to
replace all the license comments with her own. Are we doing her any
service? Should we put some generic TODO comment?
Am I too pedantic?
Hadrian
