[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58400#action_58400
]
Stephen Gargan commented on CAMEL-2482:
---------------------------------------
No problem, I guess your spellchecker is better than mine ;) There is
no need for the dep on bouncycastle at the component level as
everything was fully testable with what ships with the JDK. As soon as
you start using the component you'll want something more fully
featured though i.e. bouncy. I guess an example that used it would
probably be better.
I agree, the common crypto uri prefix is better too. Have you made the
suggested changes?
> camel-bouncycastle - A new component for crypto
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-2482
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2482
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Stephen Gargan
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
> Attachments: camel-crypto.patch, core-crypto-dataformat.patch,
> parent.patch
>
>
> See more at:
> http://www.bouncycastle.org/
> Basically a Camel DataFormat that leverages bouncycastle would be good.
> Its using a MIT/X11 license which should be friendly with Apache
> http://bouncycastle.org/licence.html
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
